Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

math problem solving

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
24,648
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 22, 2006

magics of math. an unconfused couple complaining about their share

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (28)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Very Intelligent!!!! ;-)

  • haha.. i love their process in division,, hahaha... i never met that kind of process, ever in my life... hahahha...

    cool

    but it would be better if they discussed the true process of those math problems. .right??

  • @xybersurfer He didn't change his method. At 0:30 the father didn't the division right but he did get the same conclusion. I'm not speculating. If I compared similarities in 2 non-conflicting stories, how won't I choose the correct story? Give proof. I'm not mainly just saying the opposite of what you're saying. You don't sense any trolling.

  • @FireStormBaller i just read your channel comments... you are a troll. damn you got me... i should have known something was not right...

  • @FireStormBaller really? addition and division are the same? i can't believe you just said that. what you are saying then is something like 1 / 1 = 2 because 1 + 1 = 2. anyway... at 0:30 the father did the division right but he didn't get the same conclusion. you're speculating. if you compared similarities in 2 conflicting stories... how will you choose the correct story? (give an example?). you are mainly just saying the opposite of what I'm saying ( do i sense some trolling? )

  • @xybersurfer I say the truth. At 0:30 he didn't change his method, I'm not talking about 1:45. Generally the method of dvision isn't a method different to that of addition because they are the same. So he didn't change his method. Comparing similirties is enough to prove correctness, it isn't symmetrical. If 2 people tell conflicting things, then I prove who is right by comparing similarities in their stories.

  • @FireStormBaller you say the son didn't change his method from division to addition, but at 0:30 he is using division and at 1:45 he is using addition, clearly. generally, the method of division is a method different to that of addition (because they are not the same). so he did change his method. comparing similarities is not enough to prove correctness (it's symmetrical). if 2 people tell conflicting things, then will you prove who is right by comparing similarities in their stories? nice try

  • @FireStormBaller Let me clarify that. 5 does go into 0. It goes in 0 times. So what you have is a loop up to infinity.

  • @xybersurfer The son didn't change his method from division to addition. So why can the father? By my logic the father change his method which would have a big flaw in his logic, whether if he goes first or not. Comparing similarities between methods is enough to prove one of them wrong. I'm right, you're wrong.

  • @FireStormBaller i would argue that since the son is changing his method from division to addition, why can't the father? by your logic, if the father went first then the father would be right? obviously the father is wrong. but i'm just saying that comparing similarities between methods is not enough to prove one of them wrong. maybe they should have gotten out 25 pieces of something and split that up into even sets and have mom and pops count each set. still a hilarious video.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more