@xybersurfer He didn't change his method. At 0:30 the father didn't the division right but he did get the same conclusion. I'm not speculating. If I compared similarities in 2 non-conflicting stories, how won't I choose the correct story? Give proof. I'm not mainly just saying the opposite of what you're saying. You don't sense any trolling.
@FireStormBaller really? addition and division are the same? i can't believe you just said that. what you are saying then is something like 1 / 1 = 2 because 1 + 1 = 2. anyway... at 0:30 the father did the division right but he didn't get the same conclusion. you're speculating. if you compared similarities in 2 conflicting stories... how will you choose the correct story? (give an example?). you are mainly just saying the opposite of what I'm saying ( do i sense some trolling? )
@xybersurfer I say the truth. At 0:30 he didn't change his method, I'm not talking about 1:45. Generally the method of dvision isn't a method different to that of addition because they are the same. So he didn't change his method. Comparing similirties is enough to prove correctness, it isn't symmetrical. If 2 people tell conflicting things, then I prove who is right by comparing similarities in their stories.
@FireStormBaller you say the son didn't change his method from division to addition, but at 0:30 he is using division and at 1:45 he is using addition, clearly. generally, the method of division is a method different to that of addition (because they are not the same). so he did change his method. comparing similarities is not enough to prove correctness (it's symmetrical). if 2 people tell conflicting things, then will you prove who is right by comparing similarities in their stories? nice try
@xybersurfer The son didn't change his method from division to addition. So why can the father? By my logic the father change his method which would have a big flaw in his logic, whether if he goes first or not. Comparing similarities between methods is enough to prove one of them wrong. I'm right, you're wrong.
@FireStormBaller i would argue that since the son is changing his method from division to addition, why can't the father? by your logic, if the father went first then the father would be right? obviously the father is wrong. but i'm just saying that comparing similarities between methods is not enough to prove one of them wrong. maybe they should have gotten out 25 pieces of something and split that up into even sets and have mom and pops count each set. still a hilarious video.
Very Intelligent!!!! ;-)
scottwilliam9 3 months ago in playlist More videos from sinlikenkuri
haha.. i love their process in division,, hahaha... i never met that kind of process, ever in my life... hahahha...
cool
but it would be better if they discussed the true process of those math problems. .right??
xnexo08 9 months ago
@xybersurfer He didn't change his method. At 0:30 the father didn't the division right but he did get the same conclusion. I'm not speculating. If I compared similarities in 2 non-conflicting stories, how won't I choose the correct story? Give proof. I'm not mainly just saying the opposite of what you're saying. You don't sense any trolling.
FireStormBaller 9 months ago
@FireStormBaller i just read your channel comments... you are a troll. damn you got me... i should have known something was not right...
xybersurfer 9 months ago
@FireStormBaller really? addition and division are the same? i can't believe you just said that. what you are saying then is something like 1 / 1 = 2 because 1 + 1 = 2. anyway... at 0:30 the father did the division right but he didn't get the same conclusion. you're speculating. if you compared similarities in 2 conflicting stories... how will you choose the correct story? (give an example?). you are mainly just saying the opposite of what I'm saying ( do i sense some trolling? )
xybersurfer 9 months ago
@xybersurfer I say the truth. At 0:30 he didn't change his method, I'm not talking about 1:45. Generally the method of dvision isn't a method different to that of addition because they are the same. So he didn't change his method. Comparing similirties is enough to prove correctness, it isn't symmetrical. If 2 people tell conflicting things, then I prove who is right by comparing similarities in their stories.
FireStormBaller 9 months ago
@FireStormBaller you say the son didn't change his method from division to addition, but at 0:30 he is using division and at 1:45 he is using addition, clearly. generally, the method of division is a method different to that of addition (because they are not the same). so he did change his method. comparing similarities is not enough to prove correctness (it's symmetrical). if 2 people tell conflicting things, then will you prove who is right by comparing similarities in their stories? nice try
xybersurfer 9 months ago
@FireStormBaller Let me clarify that. 5 does go into 0. It goes in 0 times. So what you have is a loop up to infinity.
FireStormBaller 9 months ago
@xybersurfer The son didn't change his method from division to addition. So why can the father? By my logic the father change his method which would have a big flaw in his logic, whether if he goes first or not. Comparing similarities between methods is enough to prove one of them wrong. I'm right, you're wrong.
FireStormBaller 9 months ago
@FireStormBaller i would argue that since the son is changing his method from division to addition, why can't the father? by your logic, if the father went first then the father would be right? obviously the father is wrong. but i'm just saying that comparing similarities between methods is not enough to prove one of them wrong. maybe they should have gotten out 25 pieces of something and split that up into even sets and have mom and pops count each set. still a hilarious video.
xybersurfer 9 months ago