Obama Civilian Security

Is Obama planning to have a Civilian Security Force in addition to the military?

"We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

The full video is still available here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Df2p6867_pw

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Barak
• Obama

[ablust]

@firegod001 The only idiotic thing I see here is a neanderthal looking loser who creates fake accounts to help him argue points.

Obviously your logic ain't to strong if you have to create backup accounts to help you argue it.

Fag.

[ResistIslamToday]

@firegod001 well ya know all those vets coming back are going to need jobs, and like i said it really wouldn't be that hard to transiton them into that kind of thing at all, i don't put anything past that traitor.

[firegod001]

@firegod001 CNSF rather.

[firegod001]

@ResistIslamToday You people are pulling idiotic speculations out of your ass based on a fucking metaphor. No, he won't do that with our military personnel. Some of you buffoons are saying that the TSA is the CNSS that Obama mentioned. Holy Christ, man. What in the fuck does the TSA or Iraq vets have to do with the Peace Corps, Energy Corps, college students, and other forms of volunteer work mentioned here when listened to in context? NOTHING AT ALL!

[ResistIslamToday]

@firegod001 then why would they need to pass a bill like NDAA when we already have the patriot act that does some of the same stuff? and by the way since the troops are back and theres a lack of jobs outthere, it wouldn't be tha hard to transition them into a civillian military unit, i hope that doesn't happen, but with obama you never know.

[ablust]

@marlajameson You must live a sad life FireGod, posting from multiple YT accounts "Thumbsing Up" all of your projectile stream-of-ignorant-consciousne­ss platitudes, thinking you have the upper hand in anything other than proving what a sad and pathetic loser you are. 3 thumbs up to a comment posted 22 hours ago that simply says "You're wrong here"? LOL!

When's the last time you saw an actual female vagina, FireGod? I guess the better question is have you ever seen one?

Loser.

[ablust]

@firegod001 Let's see, 2 replies from 2 different accounts in less than 15 minutes, both of which have 2 thumbs up.

I don't know what's more pathetic, believing that anecdotal neo-nazi platitude spewed from Obama's mouth is in any way, shape, or form a 'metaphor' for anything - or having to use 2 YT accounts to argue a point.

Get a life cocksucker.

[marlajameson]

@ablust To answer your idiotic question that you are so stupid you can't figure out on your own, it was METAPHORICALLY a security issue, because if we only join the military and refuse to serve our country in other ways, our country will erode, putting us in danger, thus metaphorically making it a security issue. If you had seen it in context right away, you would not need to be told this as if you were 4....... But you chose to NOT look at the context and instead buy a 20 second lie.

[firegod001]

@ResistIslamToday In other words, you don't know a metaphor when you see one, and don't know when to stop taking one seriously. Look through these comments and read my metaphor examples. You sound like a complete idiot when you refuse to recognize that it's a metaphor and continue to complain about a civilian security force that Obama never had any intention of creating, just like my head isn't going to literally explode when I read your stuff.

[firegod001]

@ablust Wow. Talk about brainwashed retards. I'm not the one who started the ad hominem attacks, but at least mine are about REALITY, not about fiction. If I tell you that if I see one more douchebag in here, my head will explode, do you take that literally? Or do you realize I'm speaking metaphorically and don't actually think that my head will literally blow up if I see a bag used to clean out vaginas? Obama was using a metaphor, and you'd know that if you had immediately checked the context.