Heterogenous Equilibrium

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
39,695
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
There is no Interactive Transcript.

Uploaded by on Sep 4, 2009

Ignoring the solution or the solid state molecules when calculating the equilibrium constant.

Category:

Education

Tags:

Download this video

LICENSE: Creative Commons (Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works).

For more information about this license, please read: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/.

High-quality MP4 Learn more

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • OH MY GOD, THE WATER!

    ITS EVERYWHERE!!!!!

  • everything will be perfect if he changes all the "carbon dioxide" to "carbon monoxide"... I do not get confused by this small case and I could understand the thing he says...

see all

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • what the fudge?

    

  • I have this test tomorrow so I learned it in lecture three weeks ago and just learned more than my phd in nuclear chemistry teacher taught us!

  • I understand how the probability of finding water in a solution where water is the solvent has a probability of 1 given a volume of small arbitrary size because its essentially everywhere but how is a solid also viewed the same way? if we take a volume of small arbitrary size on the surface of the solid, then the probability is 1, otherwise it is ZERO!...unless we assume equilibrium will be achieved once all the H20 EVENTUALLY will interact with all of the carbon. Is this correct???

  • @R2SweetTooth i believe the constant represents how many sets of BF3 3H20 there are per set of 3HF H3BO3

  • CO? you are wrong! you said carbondioxide.this is all the chemical elements I know.

    hydrogen,helium,lithium,beryll­ium,boron,carbon,nitrogen,oxyg­en,fluorine,neon,sodium,magnes­ium,aluminum,silcon,phosporsru­s,sulfur,chlorine and argon.

    

  • A minor mistake: You say "Carbon Dioxide" when you write "CO".

    Insignificant to the examples, but it drove me crazy!

  • carbon dioxide = CO2 not CO

    CO would be carbon monoxide

  • These "equillibrium" confuses me. I don't get the point of the contstant you're calculating, nor how you can find it with just the concentration numbers. I mean, aren't there many more factors?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more