Beijing Paralympic Games opening ceremony part 9 北京2008残奥会开幕式

Beijing Paralympic Games opening ceremony part 9 北京2008残奥会开幕式

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• beijing
• 北京
• olympic
• paralympic
• games
• opening
• ceremony
• part
• 残奥会
• 殘奧會
• 开幕式
• 開幕式
• 2008
• wow
• china
• 奥运
• 奧運
• 中国
• 中國

[hoping100]

This is the spirit of China. Encourage people never give up.

[frdeyznh]

amazing

[humourlayers]

Go China go! Jiayou! You are capable of making great things greater!

The lyrics the music and the whole performance are so very beautiful - like flying in the midst of poetic hymns! Congratulations and thank you China!

[Aprilshowersss]

@lightronger Legal.. means nothing... occurs everywhere... means there is injustice everywhere. This is not for the public good to the level that people should have their lives torn apart. Its entertainment. Entertainment is good but when people let it become more important than people it becomes a problem.

[lightronger]

@Aprilshowersss

It's called eminent domain, and it's legal and occurs everywhere. The idea is to take away the rights of the few for public good. Now whether this is a public good or not, that's up to judgement.

[zeeyeezone]

The music, the choir, the choreography, the set - all in one sublime and harmonious piece of poetic production! So ravishing!

[Ca1237]

So cute and heart warming! <3 China

[elfthehunter]

Yea, I'm not the most in-tune with news so it probably happened and I didn't hear about it.

[Aprilshowersss]

it was all over the internet and news when it was being built, about the injustice the local people experienced. i'd find sources but they would be after the fact, it would be like someone demanding sources when i say that two planes hit two towers in NY in 2001. its simply true that it happened.

in the end, it just comes down to opinion whether it is a good thing to take from the poor to give to the middle/upper class. imo it is not. but i respect other people's right to see things differently

[elfthehunter]

I would assume they also provided a ton of work for people, and allocated people into new poor homes. I don't know if that's true, but since you do not cite sources I guess I don't have to either.