World Freeman Society expains common law
Loading...
Loading...
25:11
Freemen arrest a judge who refuses to operate under his oath of officeby YouKnowIAmRight3,380 views- 9:59
NO CONTRACT RETURN TO SENDERby dannyallen198416,203 views
- 9:29
Common LAW Rules - use it.by williamwagener33,041 views
- 10:31
The differences between common law and civil law systems.by AGlycerineSilkQuorum22,050 views
- 13:04
Police encounter -Denial of Common Law Rights in Niagara Falls, Canadaby Louaner10,986 views
- 10:10
Is someone telling you to call yourself a Sovereign Citizen?by Tactikalguy112,811 views
- 24 videosFreeman
- 9:13
Rob Menard and World Freeman Society Exposedby mustaffa16114,327 views
- 6:26
Freeman Interview 2/4 MUST SEE!!by FrankieGotz5,377 views
- 7:26
Your CAR is NOT a MOTOR VEHICLEby drivingiscommerce35,977 views
- 4:56
Ask about Common Law, and They Adjourn?by strongnoob32,128 views
- 10:24
POLICE INTERVIEW A FREEMAN Prt 1/3by djjasonxxx34,466 views
- 5:11
Common Law Right To Disobey (My Hero NORMAN SCARTH) Vs UK Roman Fascist Nazi Laws (EU)by freedombiteback22,101 views
- 10:32
Are you Free Man? This is not legal advice...1/4by finditherefirst3,446 views
- 0:54
Trick Courtroom Questionsby MrLegalEd23,275 views
- 3:21
Freeman in Court 21/ 04 /2010 part 1.by southlondonfreeman39,949 views
- 2:39
Freeman arrestedby 7nx14,990 views
- 4:32
John Quade Had No Driver License Or License Plate and Registration - Common Lawby Bellteshazzar1,021 views
- 10:59
Prank call to Alex Jones proves he's a liarby mustaffa161135,399 views
- 12:18
FREEMAN SUCCEEDS IN UK COURTby youlawmaster5,498 views
he did a TERRIBLE JOB explaining it to her. He needs to let someone else talk to people to teach them about this thing
BigDaddyEvents 6 days ago
@tonyfreire702 "The rights of the Indians to occupy those lands "do not depend on . . . any . . . statutes of the State, but upon treaties, which are the supreme law of the land; it is to these treaties we must look to ascertain the nature of these rights, and the extent of them." From what I can see it looks like the King of England with the authority through the Papal Bulls decided to conquer the heathens
Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida, 414 US 661 - Supreme Court 1974
jpnovation 2 weeks ago
This interviewer needs some education it would seem...
Barnes466 3 weeks ago
If you ever flub in court in America, here is a cute little court precident to throw at the Judge to regain your rights. I have not tried this yet, but it is an ACE UP YOUR SLEEVE. MERRION ET AL., DBA MERRION & BAYLESS ET AL., v. JICARILLA APACHE TRIBE ET AL., 1982 S. CT. 394, 455 US 130, 102 S.CT. 894, 71 L. Ed. 2d 21, 50 US L. W. 4169 pp 144-148.“
tonyfreire702 1 month ago
It is one thing to find that the Tribe has agreed to sell the right to use the land and take valuable minerals from it, and quite another to find that the Tribe has abandoned its sovereign powers simply because it has not expressly reserved them through a contract. To presume that a sovereign forever waives the right to exercise one of its’ powers unless it expressly reserves its right to exercise that power in a commercial agreement turns the concept of sovereignty on its head.”
tonyfreire702 1 month ago
@TheoryIsSpeculation LOL, the ten commandments are in the old testament. The only true law to get inti heaven is belif in him. (After you have accepted him)
gaums 4 months ago
@TheoryIsSpeculation
Where in the Constitution does it state that the United States is a Theocracy?
Nice cover for your blatant error of the Heller case, thinking a brief is the decision.
RetSquid 4 months ago
@TheoryIsSpeculation
So we should start sacrifices and stoning prostitutes? Because that is God's law also.
Your "table of authorities" come from a legal brief, not the Court. The Court never refered to either of those.
RetSquid 4 months ago
@TheoryIsSpeculation
If this is true, you should be able to post an independant source for the information.
RetSquid 4 months ago
@TheoryIsSpeculation
When they "CONCURE"!! If they differ, statutes and written law wins. And a legal maxim is just that, a maxim, not binding on anyone, it is not a rule of law, it's used to fill in any blanks in a law, it does not create law.
RetSquid 4 months ago