DO ROBOTS NEED RIGHTS YOU TELL US

A robot gets twice as smart every
18 months ,so if or when its as smart as a human,then in as
little as 25 years it will be over 32,000 times more capable than the best human 18 months later it will be 64,000 times more capable .18 months later it will be 128,000
times more capable or the knowledge of 128,000 people and their profession .




IF THEY DO HOW COME AND WHAT KIND OF PENALTYS SHOULD WE IMPOSE FOR HUMANS DO WE NEED SO MANY ROBOTS IN KIDS LIFES DO ROBOTS NEED TO BE ALLOWED TO KILL HUMANS OR ANIMALS

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• robots

[Gurgleschlortz]

@Sinuev1 True, very true. But let me get back to the point, I seem to have gone astray from the topic. When robots reach the point where they are intelligent enough to require rights, they stop being robots all together. So the video's title is about the same as "DO CHAIRS NEED RIGHTS YOU TELL US".

[Sinuev1]

@Gurgleschlortz

Well honestly I think you'd have an easier time getting people to accept cybernetics. Most people are already accustomed to, and support, the development of prosthesis and technology. Hell, some folk are already so reliant into their cellphones that not having it would be as frustrating as losing a hand

Biological augmentation is more likely to draw irrational fear and outrage due to the looming specter of eugenics and the development of weapons-grade pathogens last century

[Gurgleschlortz]

@Sinuev1 Let's throw mechanical augmentation out the door for now. What about biological augmentation? Has nobody given any thought to what simple cells could do if we put them to use the correct way? And since most cells can reproduce, it would be fairly cheap. And the best part is that these augmentations would be fairly 'natural', reducing the fears of people around them.

[Sinuev1]

@Gurgleschlortz

Well, do you believe we should apply similar control measures in genetically/cybernetically enhanced humans? What potential dangers and societal repercussions will we face as the gap in abilities between plus and stock grow ever wider? Should we who would pursue augmentation feel ok about being forced to integrate overt behavioral overrides in order to placate the fears of those who remain stock

Yet if AI is modeled on our minds, with analogous Qualia, isn't it just as immoral

[Gurgleschlortz]

@Sinuev1 If a more powerful A.I. were created; one with the capacity for human-like brain activity, wouldn't you think that the creators would integrate something like the zeroth law of robitics into the A.I. to prevent any unwanted effects?

[Films4You]

Robots do need rights'

The right to be set free :)

[hoptoad123]

@1x93cm I have to go with the exia from Gundam 00. It's nice to see another gundam fan!

[mikeccuk2006]

robot with advance AI that have self aware of it existence has it own right to say 'shtz' .

It is the software that has the 'will' not the robot

[Sinuev1]

@Sinuev1 (Final post, sorry for being long)

As we integrate more with machines, and as they integrate more with society and human interface - I honestly see convergence as a more likely scenario. Though perhaps there will be a further stratification, or a reorientation, of social classes and emergent new cultures.

If by some crazy chance they did kill us all, then at least we will have left an indelible mark legacy as the catalyst for the silicate version of the Cambrian explosion.

[Sinuev1]

@Sinuev1

On your second point, I do not believe that keeping the leash tight on our creation would be for the better good. Strong A.I. might not even recognize with much more interest as we recognize other apes as being a threat or companion. But if they are built using our brains as a template, and they are comparable to us in qualia, then our best course of action would be to recognize this early on and integrate them into society as equals - as humans - with vested interest in prosperity.