Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

13-Science Refutes Neo-Darwinism

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
342 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 6, 2009

Episode 13 of RUSS ONLINE.

www.creationministries.org

  • likes, 13 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (CreationMinistries)

  • We all have the same evidence is a lie. Creationists have never studied the fossils. Yes all scientists have accepted it because it has been proven.

  • @gregrutz Greg, don't embarrass yourself

see all

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @gregrutz Keep telling yourself that. Darwinism says all things evolve to different levels and was published while we still had slavery in the USA

  • @gregrutz How does variation within a species, caused by the sorting or loss of genetic information (Gene Depletion) lead a finch into becoming a bunny rabbit or whatever religious fairy tale you believe?

  • I spread both the truth and the Gospel

    Darwinism serves as the philisophical foundation for communism so once again you are wrong - there is something to be said about being consistant!

    Darwin's idea has led to the premature death of billions of people as I show in our teaching, "The Evil Fruits of Darwinism."

    Keep in mind that the title of his book was "Origin Of the Species By Means Of Natural Selection Or The Preservation Of Favored Races In The Struggle For Life"

    Favored Races?

  • CreationMinistries -- Yoiu are not interested in the truth. Your only interest is to spread the gospel.

    You are no better then propagandists for marxism or any other ideology.

  • So you are basically saying:

    "There! Take that!"

    You are a professor, correct?

  • The gist of Sanford's book , a man with 25 U.S. patents in genetic research is that :

    Gene Depletion + Natural Selection makes Darwinism a scientific impossiblity - just as I have been saying

  • So just his information became irrelevant (in your opinion) when he stopped being an atheist and began believing in God...Glad we cleared that up

  • "Oh, I see...he was a genuis until he realized there is a God so now he is "irrelevant.""

    You misunderstood me - I didn't say that Sanford was "irrelevant", I meant that it is "irrelevant" whether Sanford was an atheist or creationist. His entropy book is pseudo-mathematics regardless.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more