Response to Ian Juby's "Fossils Galore" Part 6/6

This is a video response to Carl Baugh's television program "Creation in the 21st Century", the two part episode titled "Fossils Galore!" with Canadian Creationist Ian Juby.

Links to part 1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4iT8QH5JQI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ub8fmOhxU4g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NdUaX96_9k

Links to part 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDH7hzlBP7g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uF2j4pUgplc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ai7gY51GHqA

Link to Ian Juby's youtube page: http://www.youtube.com/user/wazooloo
Link to Ian Juby's creation page: http://genesisweek.com/
And his newsletter/blog: http://ianjuby.org/

Link to a video I did some time ago on why chalk is proof of an old Earth (note a contradiction, in my calculation of coccolithophore accumulation in the older video I use a figure of just OVER one millimeter per year while in the current video I use just UNDER 1 mm. To err on the side of caution I will concede the faster depositional rate as I cannot locate my sources and when the original video was made I had more recent access to the papers. Either way, 1, 2, or even 1000 millimeters per year does not help the creationist as these 100+ METER chalk deposits were supposedly made during a year-long global flood): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SKjyThouCU

Good treatment of nautiloid phylogeny, physiology, and evolution: http://www.tonmo.com/science/fossils/nautiloids.php

Wiki page on thalassinid crustaceans with mention of their fossil burrows: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thalassinidea
And articles about Baugh's 'fossil finger': http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/giants.htm
http://paleo.cc/paluxy/finger.htm

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Ian
• juby
• creation
• carl
• baugh
• fossils
• dinosaurs
• evolution

[nishbrown]

Comment on part 5: "lack of a better term"- How about "conduit"? Or is that one too many syllables?

On this part: Um, basic math FAIL!!! 26,000 X 4 = 104,000 > 100,000!!!!

3 "Ph.D's" and he can't do math!!

Great Series!!

Informative and Entertaining!!

[LithodidMan]

@nishbrown It is worse in the original vid at 1:37:

Baugh: let's figure that out, mathematician, if it took 26,000 times 11, how long did it take?

Juby: 26 million

Baugh: No, over 200,000 years

I lol'd, but decided not to include it as it was just a calculation error, but funny to be so far off. I bet Baugh beat him after the camera stopped rolling.

[WhirlingWolves]

Hey I just thought of a name for the dude with the moustache and the cute little outback safari outfit.

Crocodile Fundie.

[LithodidMan]

@WhirlingWolves I love this and will use it in my next series about Juby, credit given, of course.

[rrward]

Well done. Thank you. Now, I've got a strange hankering for a bowl of Coccoliths. (Part of a nutritious breakfast. Are you coo-coo for Coccoliths?)



[LithodidMan]

@rrward I don't know.. are the coccoliths chocolatey or chalkolaty?

[abaddon5]

I'm glad people like you are around. You're quite a bit smarter than the vast majority of people on the planet (including me).

[johncrwarner]

I learn a lot of natural histroy from your debunking videos and enjoyed this series as well as the first one.

[vtwinwild1]

@WhirlingWolves I can't help but understand why we don't just assume that Juby knows what he's talking about, after all he has that "explorer" hat to verify his credentials! Hahahahahahaha! Stupid Creationists.

[TheFeltbegone]

Great series. I wouldn't worry about the length or pacing, the subject matter is fascinating. DPRJones did a series on a 45sec statement by a fox news commentator about the British health service.. It took DPR 20 mins (if memory serves). to debunk the claims. Solid work sir

[kirafan68]

I totally agree with you; I´d really like to see Claire doing videos about that!

[WhirlingWolves]

@LithodidMan Hey that's great I'm glad you got a chuckle out it. There's no need to give me credit though. Just use it.

Watching your videos which I find both very interesting and highly entertaining is reward enough for me.

[jmm1233]

@LithodidMan yeah , naing after the research vessel good idea it will get hits on google for the research essel as well as the spieces , or name after the skipper too

[Danmill23]

@LithodidMan There are few claims by creationists that piss me off more than the (slanderous) discrediting of Lovejoy. Simultaneously there a few claims that expose the weak thinking (and paranoia) of the creationist than getting their righteous panties in a bunch over a "nova video".

I'd be beyond pleased to have my video used in such good company.