ULTIMATE SPARKLER ROCKET LAUNCHER - (Update 2)
Loading...
6,634
Loading...
Uploader Comments (tomandjj)
see all
All Comments (53)
-
1:55 cool "UFO" landing !!!!
-
fagets
-
You guys are AWESOME
-
thumbs up to the AUSIES wit the heavy artillery
-
holy shit mate that ksss
-
@JayJackoSpencer and learn to spell you mess
-
@JayJackoSpencer if you do that it would just break the launcher dumb ass
-
u should just make a sparkler bomb with the bottom open it would work soo muck better (btw i worked that out the hard way)
Loading...
if u block the back of the launcher it shoots further i made a batter one than u fags
JayJackoSpencer 1 year ago
@JayJackoSpencer no it doesent .. we know..
tomandjj 1 year ago
if you cut off the metal tips of the sparklers wouldn't it reduce the weight of the rocket? aerodynamically you could use something lighter to make the ends pointy.
iCeGungrave 2 years ago
Actually we leave the metal handles on as a counter weight. But that's beside the point. I want to know why you believe that using a material of lower density will make the ends pointy and thus more aerodynamic. what does density have to do with aerodynamic shape?
tomandjj 2 years ago
nuckelheads are doing it all wrong the rear has to be sealed in order to acheive enough pressure for maximum distance. try using a PVC reducer and try closing up the rear hole as much as possible. and put it on some type of stand so you dont burn your balls.
shotgun107 2 years ago
1. If we seal off the back we won't get that cool tail plus if you were aware of the particle physics governing the thrust of sparkler rockets you would realise it wouldn't help much.
2. what's the fun if we can't hold it.
Feel free to make suggestions but please justify them so that your not so much of a nuckelhead... wait sorry...
knucklehead*
tomandjj 2 years ago