ANC Square Off: Finals 5/7
Loading...
3,632
Loading...
Top Comments
see all
All Comments (7)
-
Are you sure? I think you have to talk with your remedial teacher again sir...
-
WHAT THE?! Come on! DNA testing would prove his innocence--that he did not commit the crime! Hello?! It would more than prove his alibi!!!!
Loading...
@goofypet
"DNA testing would prove his innocence--that he did not commit the crime! Hello?! It would more than prove his alibi!!!!"
WRONG! IF THE DNA TESTING SHOWS THAT THE SAMPLE DOES NOT MATCH HIS DNA, IT STILL DOES NOT FOLLOW THAT HE DID NOT RAPE CARMELA. WHY? BECAUSE IT'S POSSIBLE HE ONLY HAD PENETRATION BUT DID NOT ACHIEVE EJACULATION WHEN HE RAPED CARMELA. MOREOVER, SINCE THERE WAS CONSPIRACY (ACT OF ONE, ACT OF ALL), EVEN IF HE WAS ONLY THE LOOKOUT HE CAN BE CONVICTED OF RAPE.
zulfikarl 6 months ago 4