Hezarkhunning - 3 more clues...

Three more clues that cast doubt on the Michael Hezarkhani video.

See also:

Hezarkhani refuses to talk about his alleged video
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2007/08/filmer-of-accused-fake-wtc-video-wont.html

'The 2urists' (Hezarkhani & Carmen Taylor)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9_ZzzWp2yw


http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html#Michael_Hezarkhani

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• conspiracy
• WTC
• hoax
• fake
• video
• south
• tower
• tv-fakery

[hankwheels]

Watch '911 Taboo' and 'September Clues'. Wake up people.

[Magnus2552112]

Correct on both.

As a Pilot I can tell you those Aircraft Vortex are SO STRONG it will take many Aircraft right out of the sky.

I could not fly WITHIN one Mile the Vortex would down my Aircraft and kill me.

Furthermore, Aircraft DO NOT make it through Concrete and Steel Beams.

Inertia would have SNAPPED Tail Section Forward and Engines would have blown off because they have EXPLOSIVE BOLTS so they snap OFF on IMPACT.

This was done to save lives on Crash Landing.

[kansasinnovember]

visit septemberclues.info

[LithuanianGuitar]

@existenceisfake What is this video trying to prove? Radar error? So? Maybe I didn't understand the video due to my language problems, but really, what is the point of it?

[LithuanianGuitar]

@existenceisfake The TV broadcast video had those same anomalies. It didn't change :).

[LithuanianGuitar]

@existenceisfake Since when compression artifacts look like that lol? Can you provide me any video with that kind of stuff?(travelling buildings). Also, what about the audio fakery in naudet and in the other videos? Don't even get me started on the naudet 2nd hit lol. Obviously used drum cymbal samples and the ridicoulous video cuts (yet the audio isn't cut). I posted a comment about it on that video (911veritas) and it was deleted, I got blocked from commenting. Fishy stuff.

[existenceisfake]

@LithuanianGuitar If you're really interested in what's suspicious about flight AA11 that has nothing to do with specious "fakery" claims try this:

watch?v=3OtrdIl1ijo

[existenceisfake]

@LithuanianGuitar The shifting buildings--it's a DVD compression artifact--a kind that is well known. Video compression artifacts and subtle differences between footage that has trans-coded, e.g., from PAL to NTSC, and processed and re-precessed does not prove fakery. These are silly arguments.

[LithuanianGuitar]

@existenceisfake SC is only the start. There are many follow-ups, that even go further and find more evidence of media fakery. I'll give you 2 examples (naduet footage): watch?v=dBzSJz8XWfU and watch?v=l0A4BdlPmAA&feature=re­lated

Call me, when you debunk this :).

[existenceisfake]

@LithuanianGuitar I do believe it's absolute BS. I've yet to see one substantial claim of fakery presented by Simon Shack. The guy has the analytical sophistication of a six-year-old. SC is laughable. As far as opening my eyes--I would recommend for you to open your mind--it might provide answers to why your eyes are fooling you.

[LithuanianGuitar]

@existenceisfake I don't take everything in SC seriously and I'm sceptical and as I said, I have found several innacuracies in the research. But if you are not able to see evidence of the major fakery in 911 videos (atleast some), try opening your eyes. And ofcourse, if you think SC is ABSOLUTE bullshit, you are free to debunk whole research in their forums (septemberclues (dot) info), they have a challenge in there. :)

[existenceisfake]

@LithuanianGuitar Come on--if you take september clues seriously--you truly are gullible.