911 Pentagon (Doubletree Hotel Enhanced)

Can you see the aircraft ?

No, neither can I.

Enough said.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• DOUBLETREE
• PENTAGON
• 911

[ThePissedOffAtheist]

What is the frame rate of one of these CCTV cameras? What was the velocity of the jumbo jet when it hit the side of the building? If the camera picked up the fuselage of the craft at all it would be for no more than one frame (1/fps seconds). Being displayed as off-centred, grainy, black and white footage on YouTube doesn't help much either. I don't wish to smash your cute little conspiracy theory, but this proves dick.

[femr2]

"I don't wish to smash your cute little conspiracy theory, but this proves dick."

I'll draw you attention to the text in the video description:

"Can you see the aircraft ? No, neither can I. Enough said."

This video is absolutely useless. It is here primarily to highlight how absolutely useless it is. I see no mention of 'conspiracy theories;, Joker. Jumbo Jet ? I think you should do some research. A Jumbo Jet is a Boeing 747.

[shanehoustein]

I haven't seen this before... where did this video come from?

[femr2]

It was released quite a while ago. It's the footage filmed from the Doubletree Hotel. It was released on FOI request. It's actually a zoomed section of the footage. Still nothing to see really I'm afraid.

[onesliceshort]

Did you notice on the original clip which has the time at the bottom that the minutes jump from 34 to 32 backwards and then back again? I don´t know if this is relevant to anything, just as the date was wrong on the Pentagon security clip. Could be just another trick in their arsenal to bog us down with detail.

[femr2]

Indeed. It coincides (ish) with a camera view switch, but there is no reason for a timestamping system to jump backwards like that.

Also of interest is the fact that the bideo position constantly jumps up and down indicating the video has been deinterlaced, indicating either half resolution, or half the number of frames.

Also note that the frame count between image update is not constant, implying a frame rate resynch (stupid), or missing frames

I'll upload the full original clip for reference

[femr2]

Original full length clip posted as video response.

[purpleblood93]

@chunkyboy100 Alas, you too have the eyes to see the plane.

I have always said it was there, just look harder.

[chunkyboy100]

If you watch this clip very carefully you can see the "plane" continue on past the explosion. its hard to see without being distracted by the explosion!

[dectrone]

q. how can someone steal a plane when they have com with them throughout there flight,

a. they were aloud to do it........

Q. why is it any other plane out of com has f18 scrambled but none were on those planes...???

[Bittermanscolon]

w w w . t h e p e n t a c o n . c o m

The two Pentagon Police officers who saw the plane that day tell a different story. The plane flew on the North side of the (then) Citgo gas station and would not even be in a position to knock down the light poles and cause any of the damage to the building. THIRTEEN witnesses can't be all be wrong. If you know the difference between left and right, you can't deny these people and what they saw. No other options exist. Just the cover up and the lie.

[DGGRIPPER]

more 911 bullshit,

Q. What Happened

A. American Airlines plane hit

END OF STORY

[willieofroanoke]

According to the NTSB and their review of flight recorder analysis the plane was flying full throttle (apx 530 MPH) nose ptiched down.

[ThePissedOffAtheist]

Ooookay then.... a reasonably sized jet. And I wasn't necessarily talking to you, the poster, just to anybody who believes that not being able to see a jet hitting a building in 30-50fps grainy CCTV footage proves that no such jet existed.