CBC - The Fifth Estate - The Unofficial Story - Pt 1-5

JOIN The Discussion at: http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/discussion/2009/11/the_unofficial_story.html#comments
On September 11, 2001 the world watched in shock and disbelief as planes flew in to New Yorks World Trade Center and the Pentagon in Washington, and Americans realized they were under attack. But by whom? What really happened? In The Unofficial Story, the fifth estates Bob McKeown introduces us to people who believe the real force behind the attacks was not Osama Bin Laden, but the U.S. government itself.
Emerging from the dust and debris that day was a movement, known these days as 9/11 Truth or truthers people who believe that 9/11 was part of a vast conspiracy and cover-up by a criminal faction within the U.S. government. As the fifth estate reports, public opinion polls now show that the majority of Americans believe the Bush Administration had advance knowledge of those attacks and somehow allowed them to happen and that one-third of Canadians share the same belief.

In The Unofficial Story, Bob McKeown explores why these questions and theories are growing in popularity.

Youll meet some of the leading proponents of truther theories: Richard Gage, an American architect, explains how the WTC twin towers and the lesser known Tower #7 could only have crumbled as they did due to explosive charges placed inside the buildings. Others, including Canadian professor Kee Dewdney, insist that the story of the brave fight by the passengers of United Airlines Flight 93 must have been a hoax. But, youll also hear from others who dispel truther theories and try to understand why, from JFKs assassination to the moon landing to 9/11, a culture of conspiracy springs up around certain historic events.

Despite the difference of opinion between those who blame the hijackers and those who blame their own government, the real importance of the fight over 9/11 truth is that it may have less to do with the past than the future.
Full Length and Interviews Here:
http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/2009-2010/the_unofficial_story/

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
http://www.ae911truth.org/

NYC Coalition For Accountability Now
http://nyccan.org/index.php

Richard Gage, David Ray Griffin, Daniel Sunjata, Barrie Zwicker. 9/11 Truth Now
Full Credit to SaveOurSovereignty3, Please Subscribe:
http://www.youtube.com/user/SaveOurSovereignty3

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• CBC
• The
• Fifth
• Estate
• Unofficial
• Story
• 9/11
• Truth
• ae911truth
• News
• Canada
• Canadian
• al-Qaida
• 11
• September
• 2001
• Terror
• New
• York
• Osama
• bin
• Laden
• Bush
• Biden
• Cheney
• False
• Flag
• Inside
• Job
• Conspiracy
• Theory
• Iraq
• Afghanistan
• Niels
• Harrit
• Jones
• Controlled
• Demolition
• Nano
• Thermite
• Dust
• WTC
• Patriot
• Act
• David
• Ray
• Griffin
• War
• Peace
• Steeper33

[BattleBits]

A corporate mafia has infiltrated American government just as history prescribes despite the preventative measures established in 1778. Some call it paranoia, others call it wisdom. That 911 has not been "officially" blown open, exposing the true conspiricers is testament to the extent of the infection.

[BattleBits]

@colbour

The American "fear" of big government is inspired by the Founding Fathers knowledge of historical patterns, namely that big government always leads to fascism, which is why they created the Constitution and the Amendments. The spirit of the Republic is that power remains with the people, a political system made possible only by creating limits and parameters to the size and power of government. A corporate mafia has infiltrated American government just as history prescribes despite the

[colbour]

The fear of big government in the USA has always been there. is this yet another example? Im just wondering

[roquefortfiles]

@Krackonis LOL. Dude if you think the Government pays people to sit in coffee shops sipping a latte and attempting to discredit this brain addled nonsense you fucking twits post?

You need to call up your nearest mental health professional. Its called Paranoia.

Pathetic!!

[Krackonis]

@roquefortfiles Actually, for a person to "troll" a site attempting to discredit by nefarious means and ad homenim attacks is why you are referred to as a shill. It's likely you are being paid for your posts by a "Cointelpro" operation. Just so you know why you are being referred to as a "shill"

[Krackonis]

@roquefortfiles You do not understand that the bottom of those beams (hundreds of them) were larger around than your house and filled with concrete. It could be filled with fuel and lit and we could lean up against it and the thermal transfer might make it warm... You have no concept of the size of this structure, not how hard it would be to "burn through" all those beams simultaneously, (from a fire 80 stories in the air.)

[Krackonis]

@flyzerogravy Sir, 9/11 did occur, 3000 were murdered. Two planes knocked down 3 buildings using a fuel than I can burn in my stove and (amazingly enough) my stove will not melt. I'm afraid physics is not on your side here. If your comfortable view of the world is being challenged, you should go to another video. Perhaps one about cats or puppies?

[99Eternal]

@roquefortfiles You edited Les's quote...he said AS FAR AS HE IS AWARE.

HIS CO-WORKER SAYS OTHERWISE:

In 1993, John Skilling, lead structural engineer for the WTC, recalled doing the analysis, and remarked, "Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed," he said. "The building structure would still be there."

[roquefortfiles]

@99Eternal Your claim that the ensuing fires weren't considered is a blatant lie:

Take it up with Les Robertson. He's the one who said... "The fuel load was not taken in to consideration...in fact i don't know how it could be"..

Why? Because computer models did not exist back in 1968 to calculate such a floating point random calculation.

And no 707 factored in to the design would be crashing with a full fuel load anyway. Jets have to dump full fuel tanks to land.

[99Eternal]

@roquefortfiles Your claim that the ensuing fires weren't considered is a blatant lie:

In 1993, John Skilling, lead structural engineer for the WTC, recalled doing the analysis, and remarked, "Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed," he said. "The building structure would still be there."

Quoted from Wikipedia...you incompetent shill.