Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Creepy Abortion Ad 1986

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
83,529
Google+
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 16, 2008

Abortion Ads give me the willies, but this lady in her cardigan, in a childs room is seriously freaking me out.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 245 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Why is it creepy? She is standing in a child's room, folding a little shirt, as she urges support for the very violent and rather gruesome DEATH of the baby that could be wearing that shirt or occupying that bedroom. Abortion is a highly abused procedure usually performed for very selfish reasons. Look at the sad, shredded remains of an aborted baby. That is the price of "whatever makes you happy is right". If you're ready to lay down, you're ready to have a baby. No? Than stop acting like dogs.

  • I'm totally pro-choice...but that was just effing creepy. Why exactly is she in a childs room while advocating for abortion....fucking scary

see all

All Comments (1,529)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Daracon1010 Ah yes, blood sacrifice. Yet Satanists are evil. "Oh but it's for God so it's OK!" That is not at all the very definition of what you just accused me of only for an Anti-Atheist agenda.

    I repeat: Such ignorance is not worth my precious time. Good luck in your future endeavours and good luck trying to convince people to swallow that "logic".

  • @NocturnalAngel77 So really, for you to say that people should be killed immediately for any sin demonstrates nothing but your ignorance. ALL sin is worthy of death, but not all sin demanded immediate death. This is what you need to understand. And yes, you made a non-sequitur argument.

    The Bible doesn't say that people should be put to death for dressing like the opposite sex. So you're wrong - but y'know what? For the sake of argument... why would that be wrong?

  • @NocturnalAngel77 The penalty for sin is death. Atonement could be made through blood sacrifice. That's why they would sacrifice animals on the alter. What "you" are doing, is making an assumption that dressing in a certain is an automatic death sentence, when it's stated NOWHERE in the Bible. You're just making things up to try & satisfy your own personal anti-Christian agenda. That's all. It's very obvious that you're wrong, but you'll believe and fabricate whatever you want.

  • @NocturnalAngel77 LOL Ad hominem would mean I was attacking "you" instead of your argument. Considering that I've done nothing but attack your argument, how is it ad hominem? rofl. Do you even know what you're saying?

    No - it doesn't automatically mean death. You're making an assumption. IF it was required to do so, it would have explicitly been stated. You don't actually know what constitutes "death" in the Old Testament.

  • Everyone who ever supported slavery was free.

    Everyone who ever supported abortion was born.

  • abortions rule, bibles drool.

  • @Daracon1010 Someone setting up a straw man argument is stating that my argument was irrational and invalid? Oh, the folly!

    You use typical ad hominem attacks to defend your side when the truth does not apply to your belief.

    Abomination equals death according to the bible. Merely because it does not say so in the particular passage we referred to here does not make the word mean something different in that instance.

    That - by the very definition - is a non-sequitur argument. Laughable.

  • @NocturnalAngel77 Of course you added. You literally came to the conclusion "oh well because one thing happens in this instance.... it MUST happen in another instance, even though there's absolutely no mention of it".

    Do you know what a non-sequitur argument is? Because that's what you made. It means "does not follow". An example; "The sky is blue, therefore, you are stupid."

    I was merely demonstrating how irrational your argument is and your logical fallacy.

  • @mandm4evah and she has the right to tell you or whoever else to mind their own business....her making the decision has nothing to do with you or anyone else....it's the conservatives and the reigious nutjobs that need to get over themselves....plain and simple

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more