Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

On Demand HUGE Hydrogen Production, How to Make Hydrogen

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
683,935
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 31, 2007

http://www.USH2.com How to Make Hydrogen, Hydrogen Production from simple and inexpensive chemicals as demonstrated in our Book and DVD at www.knowledgepublications.com

  • likes, 282 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (knowpub)

  • Is this too expensive to be used industrially?

  • @omegapoint777 Not if you mine the ferrosilicon then it is not too expensive to be used industrially, its one of the cheapest methods if you get mined ferrosilicon. Remember, when this was being used in the early 1900's, energy was a LOT more expensive than it is now, and we have much better mining efficiency NOW then we did THEN. Plus the reactant by product, Sodium Silicate (Water Glass) is a item that can be sold on the open market.

see all

All Comments (31)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @nexus1g Liquefied hydrogen is stupid for ground transportation. Just compress it into high pressure tanks, its done daily with natural gas and we show that in the 3.5 Hour DVDD - The Hydrogen Car and MultiFuel DVD in the WHERE TO START section at USH (dot) com

  • @knowpub In its gaseous state, the first issue that comes to mind is storage. Would the hydrogen need to be liquefied to be stored efficiently?

  • @nexus1g umm... because you can't use silcon and lye in an engine, because you cant use plant leaves in an engine, because you can't use crude oil in a regular engine. They all have to be transformed into something that can be used in an engine. In the example of ALL of the above, they can all be converted into hydrogen or hydrogen and carbon monoxide and run in any engine. Plant material converted to hydrogen is great, even if it took a lot of solar to make it, you pick it up off the ground.

  • @knowpub Yeah, that's what I was trying to express. That energy out was less than energy in. I wanted to verify that (and make sure this wasn't some elaborate "free energy" scam) before asking my next question. What's the point of converting one fuel to another if you're just going to lose efficiency?

  • @nexus1g NEVER EVER is that the case, ever. Energy out is ALWAYS less than energy in. Even if you burn a log, you do NOT get out the energy it took the sun to make it. Hydrogen is a method of TRANSPORTING energy from one source to another, and it is ALWAYS at a loss.

  • I imagine that the energy input > energy output, correct?

  • Simply cool :P

  • @MichaelJE2 NO... its NOT acetylene, and NO its NOT calcium carbide. If you have the ANNOTATIONS turned ON... I show and explain EACH and EVERY chemical in the entire Production of the hydrogen. Its Silicon Metal and Sodium Hydroxide, watch the video with the ANNOTATIONS ON for the full STORY and details.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more