ILLUMINATI's Covert War Against HAILE SELASSIE I King of Kings & the Lost Black Sheep pt 2
Top Comments
All Comments (70)
-
if it had not been for rastafaris shameful worship of a MAN called haile selassie, haile would have never been known like he is. first of, he never acknowledged being a god and never acknowledged rastafaris besides trying to tell you he was not a god! when it was first brought to his attention that jamaicans were worshipping him as a god, he simply said, "who am i to disturb A PEOPLES belief?" ethios hate you today even though you worship ethiopias history and culture. shame on you!
-
RASTAFARI ! SELAH ! BURN BABYLON !
-
You clearly havent researched good enough. Menelik wasnt accepted by Yahweh thus selassie isnt. But yes he is of royalty.
-
judahh rastafarii 4 ever kings of kings lords of lords
-
selassie lion of judahhhhhhh
JAHHHHHHH RASTAFARII
TAFARI MAKONEN
-
Hail King Selassie I
-
@SKDarkMarine YES US REAL JEWS ARE GOING HOME NOT BY SOME DAMN ETHIOPIAN BUT THE REAL LION OF THE TRIBE OF JUDAH YAHAWASHI WILL BRING US BACK THE HELL WITH ETHIOPIANS
-
6.
The time when this was to be, is not fixed in the prophecy itself. It is only determined that it was to be subsequent to the return from the exile, and to be one of the consequences of that return. The fulfillment, therefore, may be sought either under the first preaching of the gospel, or in times still more remote. A more full explanation will occur in the examination of the different parts of the verse.
-
5.
3. It appropriately relates to a conversion to the true God, and an embracing of the true religion. This is implied in the language in the close of the verse, 'saying, Surely God is in thee; and there is none else, there is no God.'
4. The passage, therefore, means, that subsequent to their return from Babylon, there would be the conversion of those nations; or that they - perhaps mentioned here as the representatives of great and mighty nations in general...
-
4.
2. It relates to Jerusalem, or to the people of God, and not to Cyrus. This is evident, because it was not true that these nations became subject to Cyrus after his taking Babylon, for it was not Cyrus, but his son Cambyses that invaded and subdued Egypt, and because the whole phraseology has reference to a conversion to religion, and not to the subjection involved in the conquests of war.
teach me more. i need my to learn history. i belive Rastafari.
468361 2 years ago 13
Hey, Rastafari Knights, love the works you'll performing. But I'm a little concerned about the energy you putting out there regarding some of our leaders. Let's stay focused and not destroy what we've worked so hard to build. Remember, give credit where it's due. and keep on praising His Imperial Majesty. Bless!
heatstrke 2 years ago 5