@ecosby100 Definitely slower than that completely stock.Maybe that quck wth headers and slcks though I thought even then t was 11's.There's just no possible way it's doing 10's with no traction though.That's why most muscle cars aren't very quick in stock form.
@hotmod The 63 impalas are 211 not zl1.Different 427.
AtheistFMD518 1 week ago
@harddrivin1le A hot 427 inch ig block burning race fuel only making 376hp?Something seems off about that.
AtheistFMD518 1 week ago
@ecosby100 Definitely slower than that completely stock.Maybe that quck wth headers and slcks though I thought even then t was 11's.There's just no possible way it's doing 10's with no traction though.That's why most muscle cars aren't very quick in stock form.
AtheistFMD518 1 week ago
The one that sold at scottsdale this year should have brought more money I thnk.All the bdders were being tight it seemed.
AtheistFMD518 1 week ago
@MazzaFiveOneFour thats sweet
SuperMETAZ 2 weeks ago
:O There was one near my house for sale for 100,000$!!!!! It was number 26/69.
MazzaFiveOneFour 4 weeks ago
very slow auction lol.
gmcorvette 4 months ago
i know the vet zl 1 was a 10 sec stock car thast nuts in 1969
ecosby100 4 months ago
It was supposed to be the fastest camaro chevy made in the 60's and probably one of the fastest ever and thats all bone engine power.
duckbuster96 6 months ago
I own one can somebody give me the money to restore it? :)
Dabber422 7 months ago