Wilbon and Simmons on the NBA All-Star Starters | NBA Countdown

MIchael Wilbon and Bill Simmons break down the feuds among the Eastern Conference All-Star starters and admire the chemistry of the Western Conference All-Star starters.

Visit Grantland: http://www.Grantland.com
Grantland on Twitter: http://www.Twitter.com/Grantland33
Grantland on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Grantland33
The B.S. Report Podcast: http://espn.go.com/espnradio/podcast/...
Grantland Network Podcasts: http://www.grantland.com/podcasts

• Category

  Sports

[Jinsun Moon]

People who are hating on LeBron are missing out because once he retires, you'll realize that you missed out on a once-in-a-lifetime player.

[LegendaryGSP]

he is

[KryptoChronicutelite]

Nice opinion, mind coming with facts and arguments, a sentence basically saying "I don't know what you are talking about because im ignorant, so im just gonna switch subjects and discuss the way you approach a conversation", i don't need to read that shit. If you can't acknowledge the fact that Dwight Howard and Steve Nash combined are better than Chris Paul alone, you're ignorant.

[Nickwashere100]

you keep getting mad and defensive about the topic, clearly you dont watch much basketball so your comments are invalid.

[Nickwashere100]

no its not imagine this paul bryant gasol and they could of shipped for a young anthetlic wing maybe rudy gay and might of kept bynum etc nash is terrible im sorry but he really is.

[Antrizzle2009]

We're just now seeing glimpses of what they can be together. I think we truly won't get a gauge until next year when Howard is 100% and they've had another training camp to get together and really mesh. You do have to admit tho that Howard's game is most relied on using his athleticism. His post game isn't nearly as good as what it should be. If he had say Tim Duncan's post moves, even now at Duncan's age do you realize how much better he could be?

[KryptoChronicutelite]

I didn't compare Nash to Paul, i said getting Howard and Nash is better than just getting Paul. Not just because 2 great is better than 1, but the fact that Paul handles the ball at all times, Kobe wouldn't like that and their games wouldn't match. Nash is a passer and one of the greatest of all time at it, and Kobe still makes it not able to work. Howard is unhappy in LA because he's not getting the ball enough, because shotjacker Kobe hogs it.

[Nickwashere100]

HAHAHAHAH you are the biggest faggot, howard isnt even a top 10 player, chris paul is the BEST PG in the NBA comparing a shit nash to chris paul is fucking hilarious NOOOOOOOOOB LOL YOU DONT KNOW SHIT

[KryptoChronicutelite]

BUT HE IS STILL SHOOTING 60% FOR FUCKS SAKE. Take and shove that "Howard's scoring area is limited. That means less shots." all the fucking way up your ass. If 20 points on 60% shooting is limited, then you don't know jack shit about basketball, idiot.

[GunterJPN]

Howard's basketball IQ is abysmal. Paul's is off the charts high. If opponents foul Howard, he will miss more foul shots than if opponents foul Paul. Pass to Paul, if he has no good shot, he can create a scoring opportunity off his drive or pass. Pass to Howard, he can't create much other than a running hook or a pass off a doubleteam. Paul shoots more because he can score from more areas of the floor and because he has no Kobe to pass to. Howard's scoring area is limited. That means less shots.

[BushMaster Savimbi]

Asik is more valuable than Howard this year. And I ain't Turkish.

[KryptoChronicutelite]

Just shut the fuck up. Tell me what the logic is behind your statements instead of writing the most ignorant shit ever. Tell me how shotjacking Kobe is gonna work with Chris Paul who shot 15 shots a game first year with the Clippers, and not with Nash who only takes 8.8 shots a game with the Lakers??? Kobe is not allowing Howard to shoot who doesn't shoot much at all, WHY WOULD HE LET CHRIS PAUL SHOOT WHO SHOOTS MORE THAN HOWARD??????

And yes, Howard healthy is much better than Paul, idiot.