Neil Tyson presentation about intelligent design
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Uploaded on Apr 17, 2011
I downloaded this video from the now defunct Google Video and uploaded here so it's archived and isn't lost after Google Video deletes all it's content. Original description bellow:
This is a presentation on science, religion, and how poorly-designed humans, the Earth, and the universe really are. The presenter, Neil deGrasse Tyson, is the new host of the PBS-TV program "NOVA scienceNOW", director of the Hayden Planetarium in the Rose Center For Earth and Space at the American Museum of Natural History. He is the recipient of seven honorary doctorates and the NASA Distinguished Public Service Medal.
-
Category
-
License
Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)
- Source videos Loading... View attributions
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
-
1:58
Neil deGrasse Tyson stops a religious troll (w/captions)by thiscantbeitagainFeatured
1,331,219
-
1:17:13
Richard Dawkins - Neil deGrasse Tyson :The Poetry of Scienceby MrAbkebab
114,390 views
-
42:50
Glenn Beck talks to Penn Jillette, author of "Every Day is an Atheist Holiday! More Magical Tales"by GlennBeckBookList
313,216 views
-
1:28:27
SciCafe: Life the Universe and Everything with Neil deGrasse Tysonby AMNHorg
252,038 views
-
46:14
Phenomenon zecharia sitchkin The Lost Archives annunaki sumerian gods Genesis Revisited .aviby The101enigma
276,153 views
-
1:29:10
Adventures of an Urban Astrophysicistby ResearchChannel
207,359 views
-
12:21
A Story About Race - Neil deGrasse Tysonby Andrew Robles
174,273 views
-
Neil deGrasse Tyson
2,813 videos3K
-
1:58:42
The Collapse of Intelligent Design:Kenneth R. Miller Lectureby case
61,740 views
-
57:14
The Moon, the Tides and why Neil DeGrasse Tyson is Colbert's Godby TheScienceFoundation
163,595 views
-
47:51
Richard Dawkins takes on Religion: Al-Jazeera TVby Freytrue
103,491 views
-
8:26
Richard Dawkins: The Arrogance of Religious Personsby JesusSavesAtCitibank
463,344 views
-
1:04:01
"The World in 2030" by Dr. Michio Kakuby CUNYQueensborough
2,331,243 views
-
25:49
Neil deGrasse Tyson Testifies Before Senate Science Committee, March 7, 2012by SpaceKSCBlog
399,208 views
-
1:47:01
2011 Isaac Asimov Memorial Debate: The Theory of Everythingby AMNHorg
245,014 views
-
5:20
Richard Dawkins and Stephen Hawking on evolutionby TheAtheistVlog
130,479 views
-
1:32:17
How the Universe came from "Nothing", Richard Dawkins and Lawrence Krauss discussby Tony Sobrado
162,956 views
-
52:11
Carl Sagan, Stephen Hawking and Arthur C. Clarke - God, The Universe and Everything Else (1988)by TheScienceFoundation
580,229 views
-
33:41
Neil deGrasse Tyson: The Perimeter of Ignoranceby MrBrittish
49,720 views
-
7:04
Do Not Call Morgan Freeman "A Man of God"!by JesusSavesAtCitibank
1,412,521 views
-
53:24
NOVA scienceNOW w/ Neil deGrasse Tyson: Where did we come from?by ctw005
147,378 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Top Comments
Sean Louis 5 days ago
"Go to heaven for the climate, hell for the company." - Mark Twain
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
pjtron41 2 days ago
what does this say about the arguments for intelligent design?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
All Comments (8,767)
Davis Mclendon 25 minutes ago
Spoiler, not actually said by Twain
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
DigitalxKeyblade 1 hour ago
This guy is freaking awesome XD However, he does use a somewhat distorted view of scientific history to support his claims. In modern society I don't think we have any immediate danger of a scientific fallout due to any one scientist "giving up" and pinning it on Intelligent Design, lol.
Most of the religious opposition to modern controversial science is based on morals; you know-- "is it right or wrong to utilize stem cells?" and such. Morals don't necessarily indicate religious belief .u.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
xebek 1 day ago
Correct, my point was that Newton did not base his theology on the same stringent standard of evidence that he applied to his theories of the properties of mass. I'm glad that you agree. I never said it didn't exist. I said it existed for bad reasons.
I can call you the same diss three (or more) times if needed, regardless of whether or not you applied the same diss to me. What point are you trying to make?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
mysterlyle 1 day ago
A polite and compelling commentary. I have the impression earthly viruses are about the same as alien self-replicating nanotechnology. And now we are dabbling in ways to engineer them to serve us. Personally, I think Dr. Tyson is taking a glass half-empty position overall, and possibly antagonizing his colleagues in the Philosophy Department.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
theancient74 1 day ago
You were discussing if Einstein was a Christian. We weren't dealing with what was proof based at that point, just beliefs at all. Newton's belief in intelligent design wasn't proof based, and I never said it was. But it existed, and that's what I was pointing out. And you can't call someone the same dis three times in a row, especially after just having been called it yourself.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
david jones 1 day ago
Well done sir .. to answer your question: Doesn't say a damn thing.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Mark0wnsYou 2 days ago
That is true, anything that slows down the curiosity and drive for innovation, is and will always be worth fighting for!
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
groopsecks 2 days ago
Really? REALLY? Fuck you, too. Grow up and stop sucking denial's dick. YOU ARE NOT RESPONDING WITH ANY LOGIC. I gave no opinion. It is simply a matter of fact that people cannot prove or disprove the existence of the metaphysical - by definition. I get your 'point' and responded with logic. Now I can't tell if you got my point or not because you didn't even respond. Nonetheless, holier-than-thou bullshit. Good job, you actually got me riled kiddo.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
david jones 2 days ago
Thank you for contributing your opinion.But you've missed the point.
Nonetheless, I appreciate your answer.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube