Bad Religion - Greg Graffin PHD Interiview

Download more Bad Religion videos http://badreligion.ipshit.com/

Category:

Music

Tags:

• bad
• religion

[alphamongrel]

The chicken definately came before the egg, so where did the chicken come from?

It evolved from a religious dinosaur, spared only by his relatives because they didn't eat chicken on Sunday.

[Maatt28]

@stevecash83 However it is not rational to choose to believe in something when no evidence supports your conviction. The only reason anyone believes in a god is to fill an emotional need. Having emotional needs is not a good reason to believe in a god. In my opinion comforting yourself with ideas like an afterlife is sign of weakness and denial, which is not ok. We have to confront ourselves with the truth: There is no god and the meaning of life is only what we make it. And that isnt bad : )

[TheMechajs]

Ok, i guess you need a silly comment : I LOVE YOU GREG ! ENOUGH thanks !

[jamesdragonforce]

I'm starting to like this guy better than Richard Dawkins the proselytizing atheist. I love it when Dawks attacks extremes however.

[ghodgesis]

Thats a BIG FUCKING LIZARD LORD!

[MyJarOfFlies]

THAT'S HOW THEY RATION THE POOR.

[dennisjr77]

87% believe evolution and religion are NOT at war with each other. THEY ARE PART OF EACH OTHER!!!

[1978alexn]

well, how do we not know that our so called "gods", aren't aliens from another world and humanity back in those days tried to describe them by putting Images in caves. maybe they created us in there on image. i really don't believe in evolution what so ever.. I mean why aren't monkeys now days evolved.. but a lot of people claim we came from them. I strongly believe that some one or thing, put us here. i think religion started by these entities that came and visited us.

[jaewoovoodoo]

The conclusion that religion is totally created by man is the wrong conclusion to draw.

Rather, it is less "headstrong" to make the conclusion from your study that religion clarifies itself with each new scientific discovery. We only discover what has already existed before our studies. It was only shrouded to us, but existed before us. Religion moves closer to the divine as we discover more scientifically. To say that religious advancement is divorced from scientific advancement is to be blind

[primaenoctis10]

Anyone know what year this was?

[AngelosInside]

@stevecash83 Atheists: God doesn't exist because... and they find 20 000k reasons why god doesn't exist. Then christians say something like what you've wrote there. Put in simple matter "you have no proof, god exists" and end of story.

The truth is that atheists can't convince religious people that there is no god, because religious people are too blind the see the truth.

[Truman165]

@stevecash83 It isn't a matter of whether or not there is an absolute answer to the question of the existence of god; it's about what the implications of the answer would be. The ideas themselves are irrelevant; it's a question of how ideas lead people to live. Furthermore, if you're referencing the laws of logic, one never has to disprove a negation. The logical tautology of atheism holds until god is proven to exist.