Top Comments
All Comments (42)
-
@sonlover62 To accept some of the works of the Spirit but deny others is not only unscriptural (that verse is taken out of context), but Mark's point exactly. Mark himself realized his error in that area when he started receiving divine revelations; to deny something that is clearly still at work was indeed foolish. Words of knowledge, tongues, and prophesies do not necessitate Scriptural addition. Most of the early church's prophesies/words went unrecorded, because that was never their purpose.
-
I like Mark, but his definition of "cessationist" is simply wrong. Cessationist's accept all aspects of the work of the Holy Spirit Mark said they deny, but argue divine revelation, miraculous 'tongues and knowledge' were for a specific time to confirm the presence of the Kingdom, and have ended (1Cor. 13:8ff). If this is not so, then where are the prophet's today who are adding to the compiled Word of God? Can't have it both ways.
-
WOW real talk Driscoll
Theres nothing wrong with having a preference but when you start bein dogmatic about it and start tryin to enforce your preference on other believers as if it was essential and start lookin down on others who are different thats when you're legalistic
-
Cause title was a little bit interesting...
-
@Pietiafox Why did you watch this then? ......
-
LOL, He calls people who say one thing and do another "hypocrites".
He also tells that the bible is perfect and yet he (probably) never killed a gay man, wizards or people who ate shellfish.
Fucking hypocrite.
-
Heh, he discribed Moses.
-
"Jesus Heals A Leper And A Paralytic"
But did he heal an amputee? :P
-
So is mark a fundamentalist?
Wow - Great message! I needed to hear that...
OneAvidity 2 years ago 10
@kailia666
the true question is, where do you find your answers??
YuGiOhDuelChannel 2 years ago 3