Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Zac Goldsmith Vs Susan Kramer: On Crime and Punishment

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
885 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 11, 2010

Zac Goldsmith and Susan Kramer debate 2010

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Lib Dems have no idea. They will always look after the villain, and never stand up for the victim of crime. They are always the party who are soft on crime.

  • Oh yes? Listen to kramer banging on about rehabilitation , with no thought for victims.

see all

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @beelz3333 this is who Zac Goldsmith serves./watch?v=zN7ioCiSmtc&fe­ature=related

  • @beelz3333 But working class people dont have a say on big business. Do you honestly think voters have a say about what goes on in this country? Its the same people, the same bloodlines intermarried who rule this country. You should look at the family this Goldsmith guy is marrying into. Nearly every politician serves some elite interest and nealy always has an alternative motive for doing something. Research the Rothschild carbon tax aganda.

  • @beelz3333 hey, i'm not discriminating. I just think its typical the sort of people that get into politics. Why do we never have any real people in politics? Its the same people who come from well off backgrounds who believe it is their right to govern, and the peasants of this land are stupid enough to go along with it. If government is supposed to represent the people then why do we have people in politics an entire class above the average individual?

  • @LandlessPeasantFuck Yeah, what an idiot to say that the brutal rapist should've got more than 4 years, and that the mother in the other case should've got less than 9, eh? Stfu.

    The idea that someone who is well off shouldn't have a say on crime, is like saying a working class person shouldn't have a say on big business. In short, it's a retarded thing to say.

  • What does this guy know about crime and punishment? Another posh boy who thinks he knows whats best. You know what would be a shift in conscious evolution? If instead of filling government positions with supposed experts who never have any first hand experience from their posh little ghettos, we fill positions with people who have actually gone to prison and experienced what it is like on the streets and who have turned their life around.

  • The idea that the Lib Dems are soft on crime is utter nonsense.

    Lib Dem policies towards crime prevention have been proven to be hugely effective.

    In Lib Dem controlled councils, a policy of the criminal meeting the victim has been introduced and has had dramatic effects.

    The crime reoffenced rate for minor crimes has fallen from 94% to 7%.

    The Conservatives playing on the politics of fear is pathetic. The Lib Dems are providing the transformative ideas that are desperately needed.

  • gregamonk is just astroturfing

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more