YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

****WMD: Senate Intelligence Committee report

R. E. Heubel R. E. Heubel·340 videos
708
941 views
Like     Dislike 14

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like R. E. Heubel's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike R. E. Heubel's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add R. E. Heubel's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Jun 6, 2008

http://www.thesoapboxroadshow.com/
Washington, DC -- The Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV, and a bipartisan majority of the Committee (10-5), today unveiled the final two sections of its Phase II report on prewar intelligence. The first report details Administration prewar statements that, on numerous occasions, misrepresented the intelligence and the threat from Iraq. The second report details inappropriate, sensitive intelligence activities conducted by the DoD's Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, without the knowledge of the Intelligence Community or the State Department.

"Before taking the country to war, this Administration owed it to the American people to give them a 100 percent accurate picture of the threat we faced. Unfortunately, our Committee has concluded that the Administration made significant claims that were not supported by the intelligence," Rockefeller said. "In making the case for war, the Administration repeatedly presented intelligence as fact when in reality it was unsubstantiated, contradicted, or even non-existent. As a result, the American people were led to believe that the threat from Iraq was much greater than actually existed."

"It is my belief that the Bush Administration was fixated on Iraq, and used the 9/11 attacks by al Qa'ida as justification for overthrowing Saddam Hussein. To accomplish this, top Administration officials made repeated statements that falsely linked Iraq and al Qa'ida as a single threat and insinuated that Iraq played a role in 9/11. Sadly, the Bush Administration led the nation into war under false pretenses.

"There is no question we all relied on flawed intelligence. But, there is a fundamental difference between relying on incorrect intelligence and deliberately painting a picture to the American people that you know is not fully accurate.




"These reports represent the final chapter in our oversight of prewar intelligence. They complete the story of mistakes and failures -- both by the Intelligence Community and the Administration -- in the lead up to the war. Fundamentally, these reports are about transparency and holding our government accountable, and making sure these mistakes never happen again," Rockefeller added.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • cstrand31

    wow, youre right, i cant believe i didnt see it before. your logic is undeniable. i think we should all make calls to our senators and just start screaming obscenities at the first person that answers regardless of their job title. secretaries answer the phone, not PR questions or questions from constituents, thats the job of the aforementioned senator or PR person. they are to answer and direct the call. it would be irresponsible to have a temp answer questions regarding policy, would it not?

    · 3

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cstrand31's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cstrand31's comment.
    in reply to JakiiRSM (Show the comment)
  • DVincentW

    She is evasive and perfect to be employed by the govt.

    "Sir?"

    What a ditzy receptionist.

    Very much like Lily Tomlins operator indeed.

    Very good video *****

    · 3

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate DVincentW's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate DVincentW's comment.

All Comments (45)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • kcars409

    You, sir, are a douche bag.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate kcars409's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate kcars409's comment.
  • kd1s

    Here's a tip, when dealing with bureaucrats you need to understand the language and process.

    1) Stay calm.

    2) Ask for the Press Secretary/Comms guy

    Knowing the structure of the office helps that way you can ask for people by name. That usually throws them.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate kd1s's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate kd1s's comment.
  • cstrand31

    thank you for proving my point. you and ralphdraw3 aren't really interested in getting anywhere, you just want to argue with someone, anyone, just to be heard. i feel ya. i said i understand the frustration with the gov't, but clearly being a vet. of screaming matches on phone calls, you would think you would know better than to just lose your cool on the wrong person but, meh, whatever. thats all,im done.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cstrand31's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cstrand31's comment.
    in reply to JakiiRSM (Show the comment)
  • JakiiRSM

    cstand31 I can just hear you on the phone, preaching and raving on. You are wrong if you think he should not be irritated. You are the one who clearly does not get it. You did not look far enough, there are some pretty intelligent comments disagreeing with you. Simply put the girl did not do her job. It was her job to take control and give him his options as to who to speak to. Frustration was in order! Please stop directing your ranting to me. Calm down, use your own advice and move on.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JakiiRSM's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JakiiRSM's comment.
    in reply to cstrand31 (Show the comment)
  • cstrand31

    its like im speaking greek. i understand the mission, i understand the message, i also understand the frustration. what im trying to convey is, clearly getting agitated and belligerent towards the lowest person on the totem pole of the office went nowhere, no mattter how agitated and angry.why not use that energy constructively and follow the proper channels. dont get answers, move up the list, etc.. judging by the rest of the comments on this video,clearly im not the crazy one,both of you are.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cstrand31's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cstrand31's comment.
    in reply to JakiiRSM (Show the comment)
  • dacomedyshow

    you are right. I don't know what I was thinking.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate dacomedyshow's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate dacomedyshow's comment.
    in reply to R. E. Heubel (Show the comment)
  • JakiiRSM

    cstrand31 I think you need to listen to the conversation again. In my book he wasn't even close to screaming. You are exaggerating. He kept trying to explain his mission over and over to her. She never once told him how to reach the right person to speak to or offered to direct his call. I've called Senate offices before and immediately get directed. I have also had political questions answered by phone staff as well. This girl was untrained and unprofessional.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JakiiRSM's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JakiiRSM's comment.
    in reply to cstrand31 (Show the comment)
  • JakiiRSM

    cstrand31 The problem here is that you refuse to see that the temp working the phones represents the Senator. How she answers and what she answers is how this guy wants things handled. Who in the hell cares what Faux Noise thinks? They are totally unimportant. All Faux is is a front for the Republican party and will find 'anything' to pick apart the Democrats anyway. If not they will lie. They do not count and we are not out to impress them. What is your phobia with impressing Faux about?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JakiiRSM's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JakiiRSM's comment.
    in reply to cstrand31 (Show the comment)
  • cstrand31

    no, clearly you are missing the point as well. i am in no way defending the government or any in the congress,but i think yelling at the "temp" working the phones is not a rational way of getting answers.if anything it only adds fuel to the fires of faux news and the like to call us crazy,unpatriotic, conspiracy theorists.dont you understand?they dont use the logical responses of the few to portray us,they use the illogical ranting and raving like this guy to a peon answering the phones as ammo.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cstrand31's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cstrand31's comment.
    in reply to JakiiRSM (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later