Alternative to the many worlds Interpretation of quantum physics

The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Hugh Everett can be explained by having multiple space-times in our one Universe. In Quantum Atom Theory time is formed by a continuous process of the wave function collapsing and reforming forming new photons in space and new moments in time. That is part of the arrow of time or the time continuum that forms three dimensional spacetime. In three dimensional space light will move in straight line in all directions forming light spheres. This will create a square of probability that the observer will see as the future uncertainty of everyday life and as Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle at the quantum level. The arrow of time is continuously formed by the emission and absorption of electromagnetic radiation from one Atom to another. The atoms will bond together forming their own spacetime geometry breaking the symmetry of light. This will form the beauty of the broken symmetry that we see all around us. In this theory Time moves at the speed of light and energy and mass slow it down to form their own spacetime geometry. The greater the mass or energy of an object the slower time will run for that object. Therefore we see time slowing down near the speed of light and on surface of a Black Hole. Even the atoms of the observer have created their own spacetime geometry this can be seen as mirror or line symmetry in the physical shape of the observer. The observer will feel this line symmetry as the arrow of time or as the time line from the past into the future.

Any help in the promotion of this theory on You Tube or in the scientific community will be gratefully welcomed.

www.quantumartandpoetry.blogspot.com

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Many-Worlds
• Interpretation
• of
• Hugh
• Everett
• multi
• universes
• quantum
• mechanics
• euler
• identity

[Athrun000]

I rather believe in the many world theory than believing in Wigner's friend theory

[nickharvey7]

@Athrun000 But can you find the many worlds can you say they are here or they are there?

A theory based on continuous change continuous creation formed by the energy exchange of light or EMR does not have this problem!

[MrDkjunk]

One of the main reasons people use the Many-worlds interpretation of QM is because wave collapse makes no sense. Whats causing the wave to collapse here, and not there? Introducing Many-worlds solves this by basically saying, the wave actually collapses in all possible places, but each place is its own universe. This video claims that many worlds isn't necessary because waves collapse happens.... ok... I'm not saying this guys idea is wrong, but it is in no way an alternative to Many-worlds.

[nickharvey7]

@MrDkjunk It is an alternative to Many-worlds interpretation the waves collapsing and reforming represent the flow of time in just three dimensions. The wave collapses when they come into contact with a physical object. Forming new photons in space and new moments in time as a process of continuous creation! The many-worlds is an infinity of future possibilities in this theory.

[EpicSqrl]

Amazing.... Actually seems similar to the many worlds interpretations in some aspects. It seems strange that merely observing something could change the outcome, but I'm new to quantum mechanics. Most of this is WAY over my head! I don't understand how there are people who understand all of this.

[nickharvey7]

@EpicSqrl Yes its similar to the many worlds interpretation it is just that in this theory the different dimensions are potential future possibilities. It is not observing but coming into physical contact that changes light from a wave to a particle. None of us understand all of this sadly.

[nickharvey7]

@Cheuvin In the Universe we have an infinite number of inertial reference frames and the rate that time flows will only be relative to the position and momentum of the objects that are creating or forming the reference frame. I call these reference frames space-times because they have their own rate of time. If you accelerate time will slow down in your reference frame relative to someone not accelerating. Therefore you create your own spacetime relative to your position and momentum!

[Cheuvin]

you keep saying that we create spacetime it doesnt make sense. Dammit though, i like a lot of the ideas. they just arent coherent enough to make sense

[nickharvey7]

@Elenkhos Thanks! They are only a slideshow made on Windows Movie Maker. I don’t remember you I have a very bad memory I don’t remember anything unless I write it down, sorry!