Dr. David Jacobs - MUFON-LA (1 of 1)

Our November speaker will be renowned abduction researcher David Jacobs. He has recently retired from his position as Associate Professor of History at Temple University in Philadelphia. Dr. Jacobs began researching unidentified flying objects in the mid 1960's, and has amassed over 38 years of primary research data and analytical hypotheses on the subject. In 1973, Dr. Jacobs completed his doctoral dissertation at the University of Wisconsin-Madison on the controversy over unidentified flying objects in America.

Dr. Jacobs has devoted a great deal of his professional energies to researching the abduction phenomenon. Having conducted nearly 900 hypnotic regressions with over 140 abductees, Dr. Jacobs is one of the foremost UFO abduction researchers worldwide. Dr. Jacobs is the author of the bestsellers Secret Life: Firsthand Accounts of UFO Abductions and The Threat.

The talk David Jacobs has planned for us will deal with the psychology of the abductees. This is how he describes what he will be discussing: "Abductees have often wondered whether they were 'chosen' for that role. I have always assumed that they were not. But, I have found that there is a deeper and more complex meaning to the concept of 'choice' in both their lives and their role in the larger abduction program as a whole. This talk will be about the understanding of, the complexities of, and the consequences of abductees' involuntary tasks." As part of this new talk, David will share his latest information about the Hybridization Program and his insights into its deeper implications.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• dr. david jacobs
• mufon-la
• abductions
• alien
• ets
• ufo
• taken
• abductees
• abducted

[commonthread2]

I doubt he will ever retire from this work because it has been going on for so long but he does need a break

I would like to thank him personally but I wonder how much he has been used by the Feds unknowingly they r tricky the Gov't is not stupid

they have been on this stuff for a long time

so a guy like Dr.J comes along and ........

[dancemonster]

There's a range of hybrid looks. Curiously, they all fall within the range of what's sexually attractive to "Elizabeth." I just wish he'd have ended the lecture with, "And oh yeah, everything I just said is bullshit. Probably shoulda covered that upfront. *shrug* Goodnight, everybody!"

[XemmaWoodsX]

@Lehmberg Oh yeah. Absolute deliberate outright leading. There is no way, in my opinion, that he is unaware of what he is doing.

[XemmaWoodsX]

@jritzmann Yeah, I think that he says first any objections that people might have, so that they will feel secure that he knows the objections. Then he goes ahead and sells them the BS, hoping they think that he has the objections covered, and therefore has something of substance to tell them.

[XemmaWoodsX]

@Lehmberg I think that you are so right.

[XemmaWoodsX]

@teenee4 I think the problem is that even if it is done with good intentions, it can still cause false memories.  Hypnosis is good for other things, in my opinion, like pain relief, and behavior modification. But for memory retrieval it is playing with fire, and will almost certainly leave people with memories of events that never happened.

[teenee4]

@jritzmann "potenially" is the word however done using the right method & with good intention it is a very power tool to get the truth without having fear & emotion clouding memory from visits from our little grey friends.

[Lehmberg]

I suspect, "not for the faint of heart," applies only to someone willing to subject themselves, one on one, to Dr. Jacobs brand of gravid--and documented--sociopathy.

[jritzmann]

@Dali27 Yes, he says there's no "we" and no "know", however the statement is still made isn't it? Ultimately Jacobs probably banks on what people will take away: that "they" actually do know something - people hear what they want to hear, and I'd wager Jacobs knows that. If you have to completely negate your statement right after you make a proclamation...then don't say it at all.

[jritzmann]

@teenee4 "Regression Hypnotherapy" has been solidly shown to be an ineffectual and potentially dangerous tool for recovering memory. It's simply not valid as a research tool.