General Motors Crash Tests 1960s
Top Comments
All Comments (356)
-
Rigs of rods XD
-
@vxss26 what? :-)
-
Best comment. Ship it!!!! hahahahah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Alway about the dollars and why would you ever go over 30miles and hour.
My mom had a Ford Fairlane 500. She got into an accident with a new car and total the new car. My moms car didn't have a dent...it was a tank. (No lie)
-
今となってはもったいない気もするが・・・「テスト」だからね・
・・ -
A 60's car with a modern rollcage would be safe. Of course, emissions must be addresses as well.
-
why dont they have saetbelts?
-
@micmac99 I stand corrected....and am not too proud to admit it!
-
@ahmonrah40 watch?v=joMK1WZjP7g&feature=re
lated -
aside from seat belts....i think the cabins held up pretty well in those tests! so what happened now, to where if you so much as sneeze next to a new car, it disintegrates(but you have 40million airbags +onstar) ?
-
det vore ju bra om det var med en gm product oxå inte nå annat
These pioneering crash tests by UCLA and ITTE led to improvements in door latches, seat latches, the requiring of seat belts in cars and other safety improvements over the years. I was an EMT in the late '70's and early '80's and saw what can happen to someone in an older car. It wasn't pretty.
16924fps 8 months ago 17
@2009jimmy2009 "We'll rate that as acceptable!"
SirRoxo 9 months ago 9