expelled no intelligence allowed (part 4 of 10) PL
Top Comments
All Comments (475)
-
Dawkin's is a zealot his views are based on dogma not science its a world view his trying to defend he does not want any theory which makes room for a designer. Demanding that the foundation has to be without any possibility of a creator is not scientific at all science has to be open to any possibility its where the evidence takes us. ID is under attack because its opens a door to the possibility of a creator and thats blasphemy to hard line darwinist atheists.
-
The propaganda in this film is laughably transparent. David Berlenski is making stuff up. What an idiot......don't care if he taught at all those universities..
-
@ClyneDDW Sweet! Sounds like a fuckin party!
-
Darwin was a brilliant foot. Please feel free to join him in Hell.
-
He was simply describing a possible origin for the first independent self-replicating molecular structures that would be subject to the force of natural selection. Crystals are useful in this sense because they have a repeating structure that replicates itself in the presence of the necessary resources.
The nature of crystals is often grossly misrepresented by new-age baloney mongers and proponents of alternative medicine. Geologically and chemically, they are very interesting.
-
life is essentially based on the slightly incorrect replication of information, a process naturally taking place in the world of crystals. crystals may have served as a replication platform for the first organic molecules. it's actually a great theory if you think about it.
of course it sounds stupid the way its presented in this "documentiation".
-
Do aliens exist?...maybe so. Most likely yes, but their probably a product of nothing Evolutionary but fallen angels who slept with earth woman and produced the "Nephilem" seed. And their technology is probably superhuman/supernatural. And that's why sometimes it's scientific or supernatural, unexplained all together. But no the "aliens" did not "Make the world". God did.
-
@LeeRLang So what your saying is that the frog did turn into a prince, it's just took very long periods of time. You see...... the frog didn't turn into a prince quickly, oh no, that would be a miracle. and it would!...but no, no, it took slow gradual changes over time for the frog to turn into a prince. Nope sorry Evolution is still just a fairy tale for grown ups. Long ago and far away is what makes it believable. It sure SOUNDS like science, and I gotta give 'em that.
-
Misunderstanding science in spectacular spades...
-
All I learned from this is fuck how it all began let's just all get along for a the sake of humanity.
On the backs of crystals he said............... i think i rather believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster....
tjobv 8 months ago 8
@owlman166 You obviously don't understand the fundamentals of evolution. Evolution doesn't suggest that there would be any such half ape/half human, rather a long line of common ancestors where small subtle changes take place over generations.
And you say you want the human ancestry, well here's a few for you to look up: Australopithecus africanus, Homo Erectus, Australopithecus afarensis, Paranthropus robustus, Paranthropus boisei, and these are just a few.
LeeRLang 8 months ago 3