Garnett cheapshot against Mike Miller

NBA has the rights to this video, this is just for entertainment purposes. After Rondo falls to Big Z's screen, Garnett wants to get unnecessary revenge. Then Wade pushes Garnett

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• kevin
• garnett
• rajon
• rondo
• mike
• miller
• dwyane
• wade
• miami
• heat
• nba
• basketball
• screen
• lebron
• james
• paul
• pierce
• boston
• celtics
• championship
• sports
• olympic games
• semi final
• stadium
• american football
• defence
• hoops
• soccer

[GDyoulistening]

its not a cheap shot....... good hard screen and miller got caught off guard cause maybe his teammate didnt call it out....

[WatchYourMouthBuddy]

thats the definition of a good teammate

[kevinthanigg]

garnet is a pussy

[Mrgoncalorolo]

@WatchYourMouthBuddy that's the definition of KEVIN GARNETT HAHA

[Mrgoncalorolo]

@GDyoulistening he called it out, you can hear bosh screaming "screen mike", but that's a fair screen i still agree with you

[pkil232]

@m2diggs google nba rulebook, go to nba.com and read the rules about screening and fouls for screening...it says nothing about upper body movement. and i said those guys were experts, what you think i implied is your interpretation. of course they aren't right on every questionable call.

[m2diggs]

@pkil232 The point is Garnett made contact with Mike Miller by lowering his shoulder, thus the screen is not legal. show me the rule where it's perfectly legal to dip your shoulder. regarding the Van Gundy,Jackson argument, I clearly posted in my previous reply that you implied they were correct on every questionable call. if you can show me another screen similar to Garnett's that wasn't called than I will gladly eat my words.

[pkil232]

@m2diggs the nba rulebook says nothing about moving the upper body, only that the screener must stop in time for the defender to change direction. there is nothing stating you can't move your shoulders, only that you can't move laterally into an opponent trying to avoid the screen...look it up. and when did i say those two are NEVER wrong? im saying that they know what they're talking about, not that they're never wrong. read the rules. result: legal screen.

[m2diggs]

@pkil232 You've discredited yourself from the start. you've brought nothing from the start except football analogies and Mark Jackson and Van Gundy's so called expertize as your case like if those two have never been wrong. I brought up the Channing Frye play because Mark Jackson said it wasn't a foul so there goes your implied theory that those 2 are never wrong. it's quite simple, you have to be standing completely still to set a screen, Garnett wasn't. result:Illegal screen.

[pkil232]

@m2diggs so you want me to believe that you, a random youtube user, know more than mark jackson, jeff van gundy, and the refs. riiiiight. kg absolutely gave frye a cheapshot but that's irrelevant to this play. and when did i say "fuck the nba rulebook?" you're misunderstanding an analogy and then embellishing it to try and discredit me...that's not exactly logic.

[m2diggs]

@pkil232 Mark Jackson and Van Gundy? lol those to numbskulls have gotten plenty of calls wrong. case in point: Garnett cheap shot to the groin to Channing Fyre. you're an idiot!

[m2diggs]

@pkil232 Now your using an NFL analogy as your case to justify Garnett's screen? good lord what the hell is wrong with you? your argument is basically "fuck the NBA rulebook" and man up. SMH