He said that the pattern could maybe be found. According to the book of Mormon the Lamenite population filled the whole lands of the Americas. This would mean that the majority of DNA of their descendants would have been "Semetic Genetic" - simple as that because no semetic genetic markers have been found whatsoever. This professor however, has done a good enough job to buy some time so that his constituents have enough doubt to continue to believe the Book of Mormon for now.
Hey retard claiming that American Indians came from Israel is a testable hypotheiss. There's a difference between claiming supernatural miracles or things untestable by science with claims that are very easily testable.
"...go look around and you'll see that there are many things in the bible that by your standards of 'scientific evidence' aren't true... i still choose to believe God over science and so should you."
That's right, Glycoboy!!
Who needs science when we have The Talking Snake Theory, stories of talking donkeys, people being turned into pillars of salt, and stories of a "prophet" who stared at magic rocks in his hat ??
LDS Apologist's "evidences" are always shrouded in such ambiguous qualifiers as "plausible", "may possibly be", might someday prove to be", does not necessarily disprove", as well as the time worn "absence of proof is not necessarily equal proof of absence".
Then, when they attempt to play the Mormon Truth Shell Game, and you refute them with the writings in the "LDS Urinal of Miscourses", or quote the words of their leaders, they lame out with the "taken out of context" excuse.
Nice attempt to sidestep, but you dance around the fact that there is credible evidence to support some some elements of the Bible, yet there is NO credible evidence to support BoM.
I believe in the Bookof Mormon, but not the MesoAmerican model. Joseph Smith knew what he was talking about.
McBird7 6 months ago
He said that the pattern could maybe be found. According to the book of Mormon the Lamenite population filled the whole lands of the Americas. This would mean that the majority of DNA of their descendants would have been "Semetic Genetic" - simple as that because no semetic genetic markers have been found whatsoever. This professor however, has done a good enough job to buy some time so that his constituents have enough doubt to continue to believe the Book of Mormon for now.
messianicreformer 9 months ago
The claim that Native Americans are descendants of the Jews is patently absurd.
What self-respecting "Jewish" Indian would have sold Manhatten for a mere 25 bucks??
Outlaw1257 3 years ago 2
Hey retard claiming that American Indians came from Israel is a testable hypotheiss. There's a difference between claiming supernatural miracles or things untestable by science with claims that are very easily testable.
melonbarmonster 3 years ago
Outlaw, you couldn't of said it any better!!
cezza57 3 years ago
Glycoboy Wrote:
"...go look around and you'll see that there are many things in the bible that by your standards of 'scientific evidence' aren't true... i still choose to believe God over science and so should you."
That's right, Glycoboy!!
Who needs science when we have The Talking Snake Theory, stories of talking donkeys, people being turned into pillars of salt, and stories of a "prophet" who stared at magic rocks in his hat ??
Outlaw1257 3 years ago
Cezza57:
LDS Apologist's "evidences" are always shrouded in such ambiguous qualifiers as "plausible", "may possibly be", might someday prove to be", does not necessarily disprove", as well as the time worn "absence of proof is not necessarily equal proof of absence".
Then, when they attempt to play the Mormon Truth Shell Game, and you refute them with the writings in the "LDS Urinal of Miscourses", or quote the words of their leaders, they lame out with the "taken out of context" excuse.
Outlaw1257 3 years ago
mormons are very good at sidestepping.
whenever you watch mormon videos they have NOTHING to prove but instead AVOID
cezza57 3 years ago
Nice attempt to sidestep, but you dance around the fact that there is credible evidence to support some some elements of the Bible, yet there is NO credible evidence to support BoM.
Outlaw1257 3 years ago