Does DNA evidence refute the Book of Mormon? 5 of 6

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,131
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 28, 2008

Does DNA evidence refute the Book of Mormon?

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (51)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I believe in the Bookof Mormon, but not the MesoAmerican model. Joseph Smith knew what he was talking about.

  • He said that the pattern could maybe be found. According to the book of Mormon the Lamenite population filled the whole lands of the Americas. This would mean that the majority of DNA of their descendants would have been "Semetic Genetic" - simple as that because no semetic genetic markers have been found whatsoever. This professor however, has done a good enough job to buy some time so that his constituents have enough doubt to continue to believe the Book of Mormon for now.

  • The claim that Native Americans are descendants of the Jews is patently absurd.

    What  self-respecting "Jewish" Indian would have sold Manhatten for a mere 25 bucks??

  • Hey retard claiming that American Indians came from Israel is a testable hypotheiss. There's a difference between claiming supernatural miracles or things untestable by science with claims that are very easily testable.

  • Outlaw, you couldn't of said it any better!!

  • Glycoboy Wrote:

    "...go look around and you'll see that there are many things in the bible that by your standards of 'scientific evidence' aren't true... i still choose to believe God over science and so should you."

    That's right, Glycoboy!!

    Who needs science when we have The Talking Snake Theory, stories of talking donkeys, people being turned into pillars of salt, and stories of a "prophet" who stared at magic rocks in his hat ??

  • Cezza57:

    LDS Apologist's "evidences" are always shrouded in such ambiguous qualifiers as "plausible", "may possibly be", might someday prove to be", does not necessarily disprove", as well as the time worn "absence of proof is not necessarily equal proof of absence".

    Then, when they attempt to play the Mormon Truth Shell Game, and you refute them with the writings in the "LDS Urinal of Miscourses", or quote the words of their leaders, they lame out with the "taken out of context" excuse.

  • mormons are very good at sidestepping.

    whenever you watch mormon videos they have NOTHING to prove but instead AVOID

  • Nice attempt to sidestep, but you dance around the fact that there is credible evidence to support some some elements of the Bible, yet there is NO credible evidence to support BoM.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more