Top Comments
All Comments (73)
-
No. Not every social system. Just every social system that elites have allowed so far.
-
No, not every system is bound to develop elites.
-
Yes, the secretive and shadowy exist in every society, but they are REWARDED in a capitalist society. I am an optimistic person, and I believe in the possibility of reforming the system in such a way that eliminates corruption and elitism Let's talk about that.
Your country is great, America. You deserve better.
-
and 192 is NOT everyone....everyone is every human being AWARE and PARTICIPATING in cultural chnge willingly, ...not manipulated by governments.
-
I'm glad you understand that as well !
-
free market economics does not exist as a result of so much government intervention
-
1) Secretive, shadowy individuals have existed in every society and social system. You cannot eliminate them, because it's simply a state of mind created under the right conditions. That is difficult to explain in this discussion
2) I never said Free Market Economics was the IDEAL SYSTEM; especially today
3) Any system is bound to develop an ELITE; an exclusive club destined for corruption. No system can avoid the inevitability of human nature and it's lust for power. Thats why empires collapse
-
If you blow away the labels we have placed upon self & others at a base line we are all one & and the same humanity we are all together in this world as keepers of a world resource called Earth we all have to work as a Global Society to save self, others & all life , regardless of the labels we choose to hold as truths, taking this journey together is the only way forward as brothers & sisters!
-
Free market enterprise does not reward those who are transparent, but those who are secretive; accountability in free market enterprise fails because those assessing performance consider only the bottom line; accessible? what does that have to do with hierarchal corporate structure?; realistic... interesting, what do you mean by that?
In short, you blame the people, when the system determines who will be the people at the top. Naive.
-
Dude, I'm all for the workers controlling their own enterprises and that is as free market as there could be.
What I'm against is the State taxing businesses and individuals.
In a Socialist government, the State tries to nationalise as much as possible, making the owner of the businesses, the State, not the workers.
With their funds, they expand, and, at least try to, favor the collective not the individual(Hence "Democratic", Majority rule over the Minority).
or 'exploited zones'.
mikezephyr 2 years ago 16
The problem with the UN is it is filled with politicians.
The G20, is far too secret to be in the best interest of anyone.
darktoadthesticky 2 years ago 14