Genuine "UFOs" - Magnetic ARVs - Zero Point Space Craft - True ETs

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,275
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 15, 2010

Don't be fooled by disinformation tactics or the internet's peanut gallery.
These are genuine magnetically powered craft.

Some use high frequency electro-statics to generate a vacuum around the craft which isolates it from the magnetic field of Earth.
This is using what John Searl calls Inverse, or Negative Gravity.
There is only positive, negative and neutral. No Anti-Gravity and no Anti-Matter. Only inverse polarity which can be interpreted as "anti".

All we know is positive gravity.

Many of the sciences for this technology have already been discovered and have been awaiting funding for decades. People who apply for patents for such technologies are bought out, killed or have their patents seized under a National Security Order.

"Lame-stream" science thinks that dark is less light, and that cold is less heat, and that lighter means less weight, etc.

That's like saying South is less North, or Female is less Male or that Negative is less Positive.
This is just one of the many fallacies and misconceptions of so-called "modern" science.

These craft utilize the opposite polarity of everything we utilize.
The other side of science. Cryodymanics and Liberation verses Thermodynamics and Conservation.

There is an inverse to everything.
What we consider "less" is actually changing the phase of a given frequency.

What science calls a Black "Hole" is no different than our nuclear star we call our Sun.
A black "hole" is simply the opposite polarity of a sun. The same mass is there but rather than what science says sucks in all light and heat... is actually a Black Sun that puts OUT dark and cold.
The very particles of light that hit your skin and becomes heat, are the very particles of dark that hit your skin and become cold. Just opposite polarity.

When the scientific community decides to acknowledge the work of Walter Russell and give consideration to brilliant minds like Ed Leedskalnin and John Searl... zero point energy will become tangible for the public and all those deniers will have to admit to their own children that THEY were the reason why it didn't happen sooner out of laziness and programming.

If someone has issues with anything pictured in this video... I'd be mooore than happy to provide sufficient evidence to create enough reasonable doubt that you'll hopefully look into the validity of the information presented.

How willing you are to read through the information is up to you.
There's a lot to read.
If you don't read all the available information, the evidence will seem out of context and nothing will sway your bias.

If you approach this information with an attitude, you most likely won't realize the validity because it doesn't jive with the totality of information you've previously collected.

The evidence that will help one person realize the validity may not do a thing for another person.
Evidence comes in stages.

If you put all the evidence on the table for people, what is to prevent the dumb public from confusing the smart public?
The smart public becomes dumb through influence. So if the dumb public has a good enough argument against the pile of evidence... the smart public doesn't want to look dumb... so they will not look at it.

Nothing to see over there because it's already "debunked".
The sentence, "Someone else did the work for me and determined it's fake so there's no need for me to waste my time with that...." seems to be the mantra of our so-called modern society.

The people who WOULD have sought out the information are now convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that there is nothing to gain from even looking at what everyone already says is fake.
But being convinced of something is different than someone realizing validity for themselves.

This is how disinformation tactics work and "Cointel Pro" (Counter Intelligence Program).
"They" count on this. The more information released the more they can get the dumb public to convince the smart public not to look at a given piece of evidence through social pressure, or the process by which that evidence was attained.

What is proof?

The proof is in the process as well as the end result.
People have a lot difficulty discerning the information already in front of them.
John Searl's one ringed SEG model shows all people need to know regarding free energy.
The Law of squares shows people all they need to know regarding how it works.
The Dr. Jonathan Reed Case is all the proof of alien existence you need.

But the dumb public can't discern any of that, so they don't consider it evidence.
If it's beyond their comprehension and if they have no context to reference what they see, they don't consider it proof.

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (TheRealVerbz)

  • I would like to know more information about the video in the woods please :) Where it was recorded and from who?

    Thanks

  • @mark82101 The footage in the woods was from a man named Dr. Jonathan Reed.

    The most controversial UFO Case next to Billy Meier.

    In 1996, in Washington State, Reed was walking his dog when it encountered a creature.

    The creature ripped the dog in 2 and Dr. Reed hit it over the head with a tree branch.

    He thought he killed it and brought the body home where he filmed it, took pics, blood samples and A LOT more.

    I met Dr. Reed and his case is real despite all the hatred and lies on the net.

  • @mark82101 Here is a video playlist with about 170 videos of lectures and more.

    I have a lot of the DETAILED pictures from 1996. (Before CGI, before photoshop, etc)

    Youtube.com/playlist?list=PL7F­DCAFC7F60D70AC

    Add me on Facebook,com/Verbelli

    I have an entire album of pictures and information.

    I also visited the woods where the incident took place. NO ONE who ridicules Reed's case has actually gone to the woods, investigated and truly researched.

    A lot of famous Ufologists are LIARS.

  • @mark82101 Here is a video playlist with about 145 videos of lectures and more.

    I have a lot of the DETAILED pictures from 1996. (Before CGI, before photoshop, etc)

    Youtube.com/playlist?list=PL7F­­DCAFC7F60D70AC

    Add me on Facebook,com/Verbelli

    I have an entire album of pictures and information.

    I also visited the woods where the incident took place. NO ONE who ridicules Reed's case has actually gone to the woods, investigated and truly researched.

    A lot of famous Ufologists are LIARS.

Top Comments

  • Hey... i just stumbled accross your video by chance... (as it appears i do with so much in my life.. almost as if an unseen hand guides me into things) and reading your description has confirmed things that ive theorised myself for some time now.. almost a epithany moment on a subject straying from yours.. only the words you used put my thoughts into a clearer perspective.. that was actually an interesting read... so thankyou for taking the time to write that.. you take care of yourself.

  • @TheRealVerbz The perspective of the saucer looks bad in relation with the building, as well as the color and shadow. But what is the most worse is the crap effect in the end. Totally digital made, too brighten. Even a child would notice it. I believe in UFOs but i can realise when i watch a false video.

see all

All Comments (51)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @TheRealVerbz Oh thanks! I heard about the Dr. Jonathan Reed sometimes but I didn't know that he was involved in that woods case! The video left me without breath too! I add you in Facebook now :)

  • ET HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS :P

  • EVERYONE LOOK INTO THE SKY EVERY DAY AND YOU WILL DEFENETLY SEE ONE THE USUALY LOOK LIKE A GLOWING BALL OF LIGHT

  • Get em realverbz! We as ignorant humans really need to realize that every sense we have (including the ever debatable sixth) has, mathematically, been proven to be less than one millionth of a reality.

  • @SPHSdrumline Couldn't tell. But thank you.

  • @TheRealVerbz ......it was a complement....

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more