"Evolution & the Big Bang" (Full Sermon) Independent Fundamental Baptist Preaching

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,612
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (183)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • and he is embarrassing himself arguing and mocking Einsteins Relativity, if he is going to make fun of both Newtons and Einsteins equations and math as stupid and ignorant, Steven needs to submit his own theories to testing that can more accurately predict the cosmological properties and symmetries in Observed Space-Time. Cosmological Models use Newtonian, Einstien, Quantum theory, Partical physics to come up with hypothesis. Its like Steve is arguing 1+1=2 is wrong and stupid

  • Too bad Steve Anderson is ignorant and unawares of the ascetic beauty and awe in the mathematical methodology used to validate Cosmological hypothesis.

    And he mocks it!

    How amazing is it mathematically PREDICTING complex temperature patterns of Cosmic Background Radiation before it has been measured?

    The Emperor wears no clothes,I feel embarrassed for him.How can one argue against the logic of math and quantum theory?The most tested theory of all Science, trillions of times validated.

  • @wraith168

    What information, data, observation, test, or experiment do you have to suggest that nothing can explode?

  • @sbrooke27 They are based on information, data, observations, test, experiments, etc. Someone didn't just say hmmm lets see, I don't know how this happened so lets say some great wizard in the sky did it. Given what we know and the information at hand, theories are formed. Through science, these theories are either proven or disproven with actual evidence. 

  • @wraith168

    How does that make them not made up?

  • @sbrooke27 Ok the big bang, dark matter, and Oort cloud are currently theories that science is working with. If they are able to test and get evidence of those theories then they may pan out, they will be discarded. As for Nebraska man, that is an old creationist ploy to try and discredit evolution. Unfortunately for creationists, Nebraska man was discredited by scientists themselves not long after it was proposed. Why don't we try a novel idea and you give me some proof of your god.

  • @wraith168

    Yes you do. It's called the big bang. And dark matter. And the Oort cloud. And punctuated equilibrium. And Nebraska man.

  • @Xinthose I for one look at all arguments to see if they hold an validity. I never know when I might come across something that will expand my knowledge of the world around me. This video however is very disappointing. Personally I care about living because i believe this is our only life and we should make the most of it. I don't live on the chance that there is a heaven or hell. If that is what you live for then there is no point for you to live. Just end it and go to your next life.

  • @DrWmPierceAudio And you give no evidence of anything and expect a god to be true because you say so. What is your proof? You do understand that even if by some slim chance evolution is proven wrong (and no that hasn't happened yet) that doesn't automatically mean that creation and the bible are true. You still need proof for that.

  • @UtubeXucks I have seen what Ed Conrad found and it is seriously lacking. A lot if interesting looking rocks. That's all they are though is rocks. The only idiots are Ed and anyone that believes the rocks he found were fossilized human bone (or bones of any animal for that matter).

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more