Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

"Bedazzled" - '67 - making-of material

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,270
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 31, 2009

A rare glimpse (they didn't DO "making-of featurettes" in them days) at the making of Bedazzled. There are also glimpses of the MOVIE on this channel - "The Millionaire" sequence, with a detached STEREO score is on http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9FkRqvOQX4 and Peter Cook's performance of the title track - also in STEREO - is on http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBOPCZCAb5Q

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (davidwrightatloppers)

  • Is there more rare glimpses?

  • @cookmoore - Not that I know of! The original footage was lifted from a Sixties NEWS-REEL which only ran it as PART of a news "round-up" - they didn't DO "making-of featurettes" in those days!

Top Comments

  • Interesting that Ian, Eleanor and Barry all mention Peter's beauty at the time. Gotta agree there...

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • :)

    Thanks.

    Sorry my grammar was off -meant to say, "Are there..."

  • They don't have this whole thing on DVD

    Thanks!

  • Yeah. Cruise - like Connery, Al Pacino, Roger Moore, Telly Savalas, John Wayne, are/were STARS - people with BIG personalities that shine thru the screen. ACTORS are people with NO personality - but who have the ability to ABSORB TOTALLY that of another. And no matter how DIFFERENT the character is from their own, they make US believe it - because THEY believe it. Like Andy Kaufman as Latka or David Suchet as Poirot. If you spoke to Suchet on a day he was filming Poirot - he ANSWERED as Poirot!

  • Good tips! I wasn't at all thrilled when they made a prequel to the Hannibal Lecter movies. But if they HAVE to do remakes or prequels, etc, I wish they'd only use unknown actors. I have a hard time watching a movie with someone like Tom Cruise playing a part because all I see IS Tom Cruise and not the character he's supposed to be playing.

  • appeal to the younger audience and work for a tenth of the money. Of course, that's the problem - old people stay home and watch DVDs. Cinema audiences are getting YOUNGER - while I just keep getting OLDER !

  • Oh, right! (I was confused!) I find there are six kinds of film worth travelling miles to AVOID - in addition to remakes, no-brainer actioners, effects movies (I've nothing against digital when it's used to move the STORY along - but when the effects ARE the story...) spin-offs (books are okay, so long as the scriptwriter realises film is a VISUAL medium) sequels (obviously) and a new-ish one - "PREQUELS". When the actor who plays the hero is too old - and EXPENSIVE - get a kid who'll [more]

  • Oh, I didn't mean YOU. I mean in the actual clip. On the footage. :-)

    Ew, the remake was so bad.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more