The truth is NET NEUTRALITY = FREE SPEECH. Ted Poe & gang are lying through their teeth. Hello! Why do you think AT&T, COMCAST, VERIZON, et al oppose Net Neutrality? It wouldn't be so they will be able to discriminate who gets bandwidth purely on what is more profitable for them, would it? It wouldn't be so they can charge exorbitant fees to access any outside sites and censor what users are allowed to view would it? Trust Corporatism? THINK & sort out issues for yourself. Let's all remain free.
this moron has absolutely no idea what he is talking about.
tol1448, you also have no idea what you're talking about.
if comcast decides that they don't want this jackass to have viable competition in the next election, for example, they could just block his opponent's isp.
if you want 1984, you should support this moron. this has the potential to do more in limiting free communication than anything the government could possibly create. after all, it's media companies who will rule
This dip shit is trying to confuse the public by trying to make people vote fore John McCain's trojan horse of a bill called the "Internet Freedom act of 2009"
Net Neutrality would make ISP's treat ALL internet traffic equally, and not discriminate one over another.
Google "Net Neutrality" if you want to know what's REALLY in the bill, instead of taking this guys word for it.
Get your tech advise from a real techie like me, instead of a lying politician
Everything he said about controlling the internet is true....
EXCEPT that the Net Neutrality bill would PREVENT the ISPs (AT&T, Comcast ect) from limiting free speech on the internet.
It's the ISP's that want control over the internet content, not the government (Yet... any how)
Their other bullshit version of the bill called the "" Internet Freedom act of 2009 "" is a FARSE and it does the exact opposite of what the title says.
The truth is NET NEUTRALITY = FREE SPEECH. Ted Poe & gang are lying through their teeth. Hello! Why do you think AT&T, COMCAST, VERIZON, et al oppose Net Neutrality? It wouldn't be so they will be able to discriminate who gets bandwidth purely on what is more profitable for them, would it? It wouldn't be so they can charge exorbitant fees to access any outside sites and censor what users are allowed to view would it? Trust Corporatism? THINK & sort out issues for yourself. Let's all remain free.
draphaelc 8 months ago
this moron has absolutely no idea what he is talking about.
tol1448, you also have no idea what you're talking about.
if comcast decides that they don't want this jackass to have viable competition in the next election, for example, they could just block his opponent's isp.
if you want 1984, you should support this moron. this has the potential to do more in limiting free communication than anything the government could possibly create. after all, it's media companies who will rule
brianjones1228 1 year ago
Thank you Mr. Poe the last thing we need is more government involvement in communications, 1984 was a warning not a manual.
TOL1488 2 years ago
PUSH NET NEUTRALITY AT ALL COSTS.
This dip shit is trying to confuse the public by trying to make people vote fore John McCain's trojan horse of a bill called the "Internet Freedom act of 2009"
Net Neutrality would make ISP's treat ALL internet traffic equally, and not discriminate one over another.
Google "Net Neutrality" if you want to know what's REALLY in the bill, instead of taking this guys word for it.
Get your tech advise from a real techie like me, instead of a lying politician
Pv8man 2 years ago
Oh god....what an idiot
Everything he said about controlling the internet is true....
EXCEPT that the Net Neutrality bill would PREVENT the ISPs (AT&T, Comcast ect) from limiting free speech on the internet.
It's the ISP's that want control over the internet content, not the government (Yet... any how)
Their other bullshit version of the bill called the "" Internet Freedom act of 2009 "" is a FARSE and it does the exact opposite of what the title says.
Pv8man 2 years ago