Is the big bang theory a scientific fact?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,006
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 21, 2009

This clip is from our series, "The Scientific Evidence That Proves God Created." It answers the question: Is the big bang theory a scientific fact?

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Kent Hovind will give you a $250,000 reward if you can offer any empirical evidence to prove this.

    drdino.com/250k-offer/

  • @Immortalsouls who read will realize to be rational and logical—to actually look for the truth and never accept claims without evidence to prove it.

  • @Immortalsouls Uh, sorry, but if you believe that popularity indicates something is true, then all you're doing is simply accepting claims based on what majority people are saying without diving deeper into what their evidence is and if it proves it. You're being gullible. Also, please go study the Big Bang more, and make sure your sources are actually reliable—don't just assume they are just because they agree with your pre-thoughts. I doubt you'll change your mind though, but hopefully people

  • @Scyntist I already believe aliens exist.. purely because of all the testimonies of people, the millions of them. Plus I have seen a ufo myself before... only 20 metres away!!

    I don't think there was ever a Big Bang, and the universe isn't expanding. This is based off of new scientists who are for the truth. That Quasars prove that red shift light isn't a measure of distance.. and that we don't know if the universe is really expanding at all.

    I believe God created the universe.

  • @Immortalsouls Testimonies would NOT hold up in court by themselves, and if they do, they are sadly mistaken. They are subjective, anecdotal hearsay with no credibility. Would you believe those writings if they said that aliens exist instead of Jesus Christ? And the Big Bang Theory has evidence—it doesn't rely on ancient text to prove its case, and can be demonstrated with empirical evidence. You don't understand the BB if you really think scientists came up with it at the top of their heads

  • @Scyntist Jesus Christ is real based off of the Testimonies given by the 5 Apostles.. plus more! There is more Testimony to the real life of Jesus Christ than there is of Pilate.

    These Testimonies have so much credit, they would hold up in court to the amount of someone being imprisoned for life or given freedom for life.

    I'll tell you what is a fairy tale, your scientists and the big bang theory, based off the top of their imaginary heads!

  • @Immortalsouls You're confusing the general meaning of a theory with the scientific one. A scientific theory uses available empirical data about observations, and is put forth as a principle or body of principles for explaining a class of phenomena and make predictions based on that data. Jesus Christ is not real because he hasn't been proven—just as unicorns don't exist because of the lack of evidence that proves they do. The bible is not a credible source either, as it is anecdotal testimony.

  • It is not a fact haha.

    If it is... how you gonna prove it?

  • what a haircut

  • So God needed a universe that is hundreds of billions of light years in size to produce one tiny planet capable of supporting life?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more