Evidence for Evolution, Part III

WHAT IF INSERTION IS NOT RANDOM
If you run the numbers with the assumption that ERVs can only insert in 1% of the genome, i.e. highly nonrandom, you still get enormously low probabilities with only 16 ERVs. So even if insertion is highly nonrandom, getting the thousands of matched ERVs between all primates is unbelievably unlikely just like I show in the video (don't believe me, do the math).

Endogenous Retroviruses (ERVs) are the relics of ancient viral infections preserved in our DNA. The odd thing is many ERVs are located in exactly the same position on our genome and the chimpanzee genome. There are two explanations for the perfectly matched ERV locations. Either it is an unbelievable coincidence that viruses just by chance inserted in exactly the same location in our genomes, or humans and chimps share a common ancestor. It was our common ancestor that was infected, and we both inherited the ERVs. ERVs providence the closest thing to a mathematical proof for evolution. And remember, ERVs are just one of the millions of FACTS that support the theory of evolution. Think about it.

To download this video please go to:
http://www.mediafire.com/?4oubmomm34g

If you wish to translate this video you can download the PowerPoint file from:
http://www.mediafire.com/?tnzy2ynjymy

ERV positions taken from:
C. M. Romano, R. F. Ramalho, and P. M. de A. Zanotto; Tempo and mode of ERV-K evolution in human and chimpanzee genomes. Arch Virol (2006) 151: 22152228

Probabilities calculates using random insertion into a genome containing 3 billion bases. Yes, some ERVs have shown to not insert perfectly randomly, but none show perfect site selection. Accounting for non-random insertion would NOT reduce the probabilities much.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Evolution
• Creation
• Intelligent
• Design
• DNA
• Human
• Chimp
• Genome
• Chromosome
• Endogenous
• Retrovirus
• ERV
• Probability
• Virus

[cavemantiger]

@RaizeMusic ev·o·lu·tion/ˌevəˈlo͞oSHən/

Noun: The process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the...  The gradual development of something, esp. from a simple to a more complex form.

Bankrupt was not the word you are looking for.

[RaizeMusic]

@cavemantiger "If you have any sense of a brain, you could learn about it."

If you have heard of evolution, I highly doubt you actually understand what it means, as most who claim it to be correct and perpetuate it dogmatically, like yourself, consistently prove to be ignorant of it actually is.

[RaizeMusic]

@cavemantiger "It's people like you that allow ignorance and stupidity to still exist in the world"

Oh really? Is that why many of the early forefathers of science, from Newton to Pascal to Boyle, were all God believing? You are bankrupt, according to you, having faith = scientific stupidity and unintelligence, when history itself is the unpleasant "slap in your face" in regards to that. You need to wake up, your prejudice is putrid and meaningless.

[cavemantiger]

@RaizeMusic I have loads of proof of evolution. It is real. If you have any sense of a brain, you could learn about it.

Where is your proof for your magical fairy god?

It's people like you that allow ignorance and stupidity to still exist in the world.

[RaizeMusic]

"LOL how pathetic"

Aside from sticking your fingers in your ears, and then sticking your head in the sand, the irony is that you are the poor thing who is clutching to a security blanket, and refusing to face truth and reality. A strong indication of those in denial, they do not engage, dismiss you, and then run away while claiming to be correct. Your foolishness will cost you, sadly

[RaizeMusic]

@cavemantiger "There is not a single bit of contradiction."

Sure there is no contradiction, provided you are generally ignorant on what evolution is and the state of the evidence it is supposedly based on. But in your case, ignorance is bliss.

"Evolution is reality. God is not reality."

You can't even begin to articulate what reality consists of.

[cavemantiger]

@RaizeMusic The fields of science prove it, not contradict it. There is not a single bit of contradiction.

God does not exist, there is no proof. Reality is something that exists and can be proven.

Evolution is reality. God is not reality. You poor, simple thing.

God does not exist, everything else does. You just don't want to acknowledge the truth because you're primal fears keep you clutching that security blanket you call religion. LOL how pathetic.

[RaizeMusic]

"No, you can't. LOL"

God exists, whether you care to agree or not. On your end, all that is involved is the denial of this reality, plain and simple. You are ready to submit to an atheistic materialism, when there exists a temporal universe we know began a finite amount of time ago. If God did not exist, then noting would.

[RaizeMusic]

@cavemantiger "I can prove evolution."

You can't prove an idea that is contradicted by the very fields of science it is supposedly based on. The Darwinian prediction is a joke. There is surely a commonality in biological life, Darwinism is not the explanation for it, however.

[St00sh13]

@St00sh13 By the way, I am an atheist and evolution is the only explanation that has any evidence to support it,.