9/11 Probability Files: The Miracle Pilots (Part 1)

Tosen uses probabilities on the two planes that struck each of the twin towers of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• 9/11
• probabilities
• probability files
• miracle
• pilots
• part
• one
• paris
• tosen
• conspiracy
• boeing
• mathematics
• september 11
• terrorism
• war
• in
• iraq
• afghanistan

[reebok3d]

in your vid go to @1:35 look at the right wing, it disappears then reappears a second later..

the planes were HOLOGRAMS!!!

search youtube... type in 911 holograms...

no BS, look at all the different clips of the planes hittin the towers, they glitch in all of them...

[TalessiansReality]

@reebok3d I'm not a fan of the hologram plane theory. Regardless, my theory focuses on the probability of two airlines (or flying objects) hitting each separate tower on the first try. The probability tells it all for me.

[reebok3d]

@TalessiansReality that is true, the probability tells it all, what are the odds of two planes hitn like they did... its cause they were holograms... did you look at the clip in this vid that you put up? it clearly shows the wing glitch, even other vids that show that same plane from a different angle show the wind disappear... so what do you really think happened then? they were remote controlled?? cause if they were remore controlled... how do you explain the glitches?

[TalessiansReality]

@reebok3d I've looked over the video. I do not see any disappearing wing. I do see the wing change as the plane changes angle. I have watched airplanes take off and land for many years when I was younger, the plane's characteristics are totally within realism and look and appear very real to me. In fact, the pilot did a great job (whoever it was). I mean this was good flyin. But if my views change, I will report it. You make a video on it maybe. Explain it.

[GeorgeAlexanderOz]

Good approach. There is an inconsistency in your argument. If you grant the pilots the capability to professionally fly the aircraft according to assumption 2, assumption 1 can't be appropriate. Their intention is more effective and thus affects assumption 1. With effective intention, flying an aircraft is to a lesser degree like throwing dice.

[TalessiansReality]

@GeorgeAlexanderOz Assumption #1 says that my list of 22 possible outcomes are all "likely." From that diagram. I don't see how piloting skill affects that.

[TalessiansReality]

@ARTILECT4U Tower 7 fell down because it was laughing hysterically at the lunacy going on. That's my guess.

[ARTILECT4U]

I FEEL SO BAD...you never mentioned the third tower...that fell DOWN for SYMPATHY!!!

[LiquidR1Ryder]

@TalessiansReality

Not sure how you can possibly miss the disappearing wing, it's in numerous videos. The wing simply vanishes into thin air. I was against the hologram theory until I carefully watched it over and over again, the wing completely missing in several frames of video.

[spawnofstardust]

im still pretty pissed the truth hasn't come out about this. it wasn't holograms, come on people, that's just putting the veil on it thicker. it's obvious what happened & why but "THEY" will neVer come out & say it of course.

[GeorgeAlexanderOz]

@TalessiansReality In reality, piloting skills do effect the outcome. I understand that you postulate the outcomes all be equally likely. Be it so, for the sake of demonstration.

The odds you call are nowhere near the real number, but your idea is still fine.

[tdebat]

According to John Lear (lear jets) a pilot doing this would be a real trick.

[MarsHasLife]

@ARTILECT4U "The Fire Burned it down... "