Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Dingo attack

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
10,074
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 26, 2011

An Easter holiday on Queensland's Fraser Island turned sour when a young girl was mauled by 2 dingos.
For more NEWS go to www.tennews.com.au

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Why the fuck do they kill the animals ? As if it knows not to attack humans, it's a wild animal. HUMANS were trespassing on their territory, it's no suprise. We hunt animals, so do they. It's all apart of nature and it all comes down to the fault of humans. I'm not an animal activist but I just don't get it.

  • FAIL Parenting !

see all

All Comments (18)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Wow. Those dingoes have almost zero fear of humans. Look how close they come to people. That's dangerous. But, that's what some wolves did thousands of years ago, scavenged off humans, and that's how some eventually evolved into dogs. It makes sense, I guess. Nevertheless, some people there seem to have very little respect for the danger any wild animal may present. I saw another video where a lady was mocking fear of such an animal. Not smart.

  • So why do people in Australia still question what happened in the Lindsey Chamberlain case? A dingo is more than capable of killing a newborn baby

  • Who lets a small three year old wander off into the bush??? ...Just...sad...

  • Move to the USA and carry a gun with you all the time, Dingo comes up you shoot him.

  • @TheRedParallel

    Some people value human life over wild animal life. Like they think that we are more deserving to be on this planet, and my god if any wolf or shark dare attack us or any other human being they have to destroy the wild animal doing what nature has intended because they have to protect our human life first and foremost over everything else.

    That's how I see them thinking sometimes. I am not an animal activist either, so I am in your boat. Just let animals live!

  • If we allowed animals alone in place would not pass these things, they were there before, and do not understand the stupidity of trying to humanize human, or try to have at home are truly wild animals, because 5000 years ago that the dingo was separated comvertirse of man in a wild dog

  • Then the only true natives must be the indigenous peoples of Africa, given that 'technically, based on evidence', all others migrated out of Africa. So the American Indian is not native, nor the Aborigine of Australia....what a stupid argument my friend. The Dingo has been in Australia 4000 or so years.......sounds native enough for me.

  • We rounded up their people and put them on 'Missions'. We then fenced the land and put livestock on their hunting grounds. And every time there is an altercation we blame them. Interesting really, considering there is only a problem when we enter the equation.

  • @MidnightKobra123 It depends on how you define native. Technically, based on evidence, it is introduced (unless you come up with a pretty weird explanation). But for many it doesn't matter how long they have been in Australia what counts for them is that they were brought their by humans.

    Up here the dingo counts as an archaeozoa, meaning established and kinda native´albeit niot necessariyl indigenous, its rather like 'makes no sense anymore to remove them'.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more