Meta-Magick - Magick and NLP - Attention Influences Reality
Loading...
26,548
Loading...
Uploader Comments (metamagick)
Top Comments
-
it makes so much sense. You can't move forward with your mind behind you
-
Right. Common sense implies evaluating things from your preconceptions, rather than experimenting and exploring and using your actual, in fact, senses.
see all
All Comments (27)
-
Chi follows mind, blood follows chi.
;-)
-
I'm liking it phil!
-
the same as lilith told me that we have to focus then put our intent with that what we focus on and then look what happens.bless you all.
-
either way.
-
this guy comes out in a video i have called Magik and Entheogens vol.1 Cannibus
Loading...
Want to learn a whole lot more about this stuff? Check out the events at hawkridgeproductions(dot)com!
metamagick 11 months ago
Sir sorry to bother i really enjoyed your video but why are you attributing meta magic to yourself isn't it Richard Bandler who came up with the idea ?
BLAZINGSTAR322 1 year ago
@BLAZINGSTAR322 Richard Bandler has done many magical things and his work is certainly an influence on this stuff (along with, for instance, in this exercise, Aikido and many other practices), but no, meta-magick is not his idea.
metamagick 1 year ago
@metamagick Sir, do you think that most people ignore the modeling aspects of NLP?
emomagica 11 months ago
@emomagica Not sure I can speak for most people. When I teach NLP Practitioner courses (see hawkridgeproductions(dot)com), it is largely about modeling. I do understand that some people get caught up in learning techniques for various interventions and believe that substitutes for modeling. IMO, learning specific techniques is a good way to learn what kinds of things to observe and listen for and what kinds of questions to ask... but if that's all you learn, you're not getting the full benefit.
metamagick 11 months ago
With your attention on something in back of you, wouldn't the likely result be that you don't push as much forward? To me it seems like a matter of momentum.
DaveIrie 3 years ago
Seems like a good explanation. Have you performed the experiment?
metamagick 3 years ago