Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Meta-Magick - Magick and NLP - Attention Influences Reality

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
26,548
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 12, 2006

In this clip from a live seminar, Philip H. Farber demonstrates a basic principle of Meta-Magick, that where and how you place your attention can influence your reality. In this exercise, a subject places his attention behind him and has difficulty pushing past Phil's arm - however, when he places his attention ahead of him, he pushes past very easily.

Meta-Magick draws on diverse roots, including Neuro-linguistic Programming (NLP), martial arts, memetics, applied kinesiology, hypnosis, yoga, Taoism, neuro-scientific discoveries, and much more, in addition to Western esoteric traditions. Meta-Magick offers tools and systems to uncover, observe and replicate phenomena in ways that can be calibrated and tested. "Meta" means "above" or "beyond," and "Meta-Magick" signifies magick that enables us to think about magick and produce magick. It is magick about magick.

For more info: http://www.meta-magick.com/

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (metamagick)

  • Want to learn a whole lot more about this stuff? Check out the events at hawkridgeproductions(dot)com!

  • Sir sorry to bother i really enjoyed your video but why are you attributing meta magic to yourself isn't it Richard Bandler who came up with the idea ?

  • @BLAZINGSTAR322 Richard Bandler has done many magical things and his work is certainly an influence on this stuff (along with, for instance, in this exercise, Aikido and many other practices), but no, meta-magick is not his idea.

  • @metamagick Sir, do you think that most people ignore the modeling aspects of NLP?

  • @emomagica Not sure I can speak for most people. When I teach NLP Practitioner courses (see hawkridgeproductions(dot)com), it is largely about modeling. I do understand that some people get caught up in learning techniques for various interventions and believe that substitutes for modeling. IMO, learning specific techniques is a good way to learn what kinds of things to observe and listen for and what kinds of questions to ask... but if that's all you learn, you're not getting the full benefit.

  • With your attention on something in back of you, wouldn't the likely result be that you don't push as much forward? To me it seems like a matter of momentum.

  • Seems like a good explanation. Have you performed the experiment?

Top Comments

  • it makes so much sense. You can't move forward with your mind behind you

  • Right. Common sense implies evaluating things from your preconceptions, rather than experimenting and exploring and using your actual, in fact, senses.

see all

All Comments (27)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Chi follows mind, blood follows chi.

    ;-)

  • I'm liking it phil!

  • the same as lilith told me that we have to focus then put our intent with that what we focus on and then look what happens.bless you all.

  • either way.

  • this guy comes out in a video i have called Magik and Entheogens vol.1 Cannibus

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more