1969 Pontiac car Commercial

http://www.zazzle.co.uk/samkar


Vintage 1969 Pontiac car Commercial

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• Classic
• car
• Commercial;
• 1969
• Pontiac
• ;1960's;vintage
• tv

[73849309378]

At least we can look at videos of real cars, since they quit making them.

[italy4blktop]

it is amazing that the 5 Divisions of GM had such distinctive differences in the 60's and even into the early '70s. Rather sad now that we have to litter our roads and eyesight with "fortune cookie-cutter" Asian cars made of cardboard. The domestic auto makers are still making great cars but the styling and imagination seems faded away....Harley Earl where are you?

[73849309378]

@JuggernautJournalist LMAO 60's American made cars would blow the doors off your foreign plastic TOY-ota cars!

[JuggernautJournalist]

@73849309378 Actually it takes ALOT 2"entertain" me: I demand a car with an engine that I can push the s***t out of that will never break down, like if its a totoyta all of which come w/ DHOC not SHOC & a CHAIN NO SQUEAKY BELT, nevers breaks, BOO YAAH!! . I demand cutting edge technology like variable valve timining that boosts performance AND keeps fuel economy low I demand lightweight material that raise weight2power ratio & give body sexy look: Ricers have that & pontiacs dont.

[73849309378]

@JuggernautJournalist LMHO you obviously don't know what a car is. Doesn't take much to entertain you.

[JuggernautJournalist]

@73849309378 There wereen't real cars, that's why they stopped making them, cause they were clunky & rusted & broke down & people stopped buying them. Ricers are inexpensive, get amazing fuel economy, & above all are a ton of fun to drive: Now that's a real car :)

[lirr408]

I love Pontiac

[12101916]

WOw! that was a long commercial.

[GeorgeVreelandHill]

Cars from the 60's were awesome.

Nothing cheap in them.

I wish they made cars today with those old designs.

How cool would that be?

George Vreeland Hill

George Vreeland Hill

[liddlebopeep]

@cadillac4100 You got shit for brains old man. I said 120 HP PER LITER. If the Caddy made 120 hp PER LITER like the S2000, it would make 984 hp (8.2L x 120hp/liter) TOTAL. At 400 hp, it doesn't even make half of the potential hp Honda is able to wring out of one liter. The S2000 will kick your Caddy's ass: 2800 lbs and 0-60 in 5.4 seconds.

So what is 400hp? Do you take into consideration curb weight, aerodynamics, transmission ratios, etc.? Old people are so useless!

[cadillac4100]

@liddlebopeep Honda makes aluminum engines you moron..the 8.2 Liter is an iron block engine which means it won't be prone to falling apart like your brain is right now(LOL!)..120hp?? against 400 hp?? Who do you think would win that If you say 120 hp you are as stupid as horse dung even more stupider than the hot sun on mercury..

[liddlebopeep]

@cadillac4100 Idiot! Honda builds the world's best engines, the S2000 has the highest output per liter - 120hp/liter! It will surely outlast any engine built by Cadillac! Now compare that with 400 hp from 8.2 liters. If the Caddy made the same hp/liter it would make more than twice that output. 400 hp from 8.2L is inefficient and quite frankly pathetic!  And so is your taste in cars. Gross!