Michael Pollan: The omnivore's next dilemma
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (154)
-
I hate this guy
-
@EATshitanddrinkbleac quinoa however...
-
Sounds like the way to go
-
What a smart guy.
-
beans =/=protein
-
@RamadaArtist I don't condone the idea of decreasing biodiversity, and neither do producers. They implement registered programs to ensure that semen/breeding stock come from diverse genetic background. Keep in mind Ramada, we're not talking about a rainforest/cheetah population; we're talking about animals within our food production systems. It a lot of cases it is easier to control the quality, production efficiency, and medical Tx of animals that are genetically similar.
-
@RamadaArtist It is true that a lack of biodiversity in the genetic pool leads to an increase in overall disease susceptibility. (i.e. a lack of haplotype diversity in the molecular rearrangements of MHC I and II). However, these animals not only serve as a food source but also as research subjects throughout academia. Therefore the very animals that are becoming susceptible to emerging disease are also being protected with new biotechnology (sometimes applicable to humans).
-
@strongness13 Except that any esteemed biologist would support the major tenants of biodiversity which Pollan talks about here (in not so many words) in the place of monocropping (or mono-meating) which, while perhaps "efficient" for total throughput, is ecologically unsound, and, in particular, genetically unhealthy. Short term veterinary practices may keep a living stock healthy, but as the genetic pool becomes homogenized it is susceptible to wide spread disease. History agrees.
-
@strongness13 Very strong arguments in a defined and well backed manner!
Fuck ethanol. :)
slytown 1 year ago 18
Just finished his book In defends of food... 5 stars!
buybulkwhey 2 years ago 13