Sen Sanders Explains Gutting Audit The FED Amendment

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,515
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 7, 2010

http://MOXNews.com/
May 07, 2010 MSNBC Dylan Ratigan

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 9 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @FreedomAtRisk Yes, that is it, Frankenstein. Except Bernie is an independent. And actually no, I would prefer Ron Paul's amendment over Bernie's any day. It is just not politically possible now. People are rightfully concerned that Congress will try to micromanage the Fed. However, if we get a peek at the Fed, and see the dysfunction, there will be broad support for Congressional oversight. I know government is confusing to you simpletons, but trust in Bernie, he is on your side.

  • @treon123456 Apparently you haven't been reading my other comments on here, because I already explained this. Ron Paul's amendment was not popular enough in the Senate to pass. This was proven when David Vitter put Ron Paul's amendment forth and it went down in flames, 37-62. Sanders knew that, so he changed his amendment to get it through the corporate-owned Senate, so we would have SOME transparency at the Fed. Sanders feels this will be the foot in the door that leads to a FULL AUDIT.

see all

All Comments (153)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • its what happened BEFORE the collapse that matters andhas all the skeletons, way to cover for the banks Bernie..there had to have been something closer to a middle ground than a one time limited audit...this makes me sick

  • just so its clear, this was ron paul's baby, not Sander's...RP brought him on board, Sanders pretended to be all in until the last second then caved to bankers..one time says nothing when we could have had permanent.

  • @SvenBenson

    Awesome then!, sorry about that.

    It's just that I ran into way to many people who rather blame the other side, instead of looking at themselves.

  • @bluesrockfan36 Where did you get the idea I support democrats? I said they are sellouts that pander to "anti-war" and "freedom" just like Republicans pander to "less government" both bullshit, hence why you can only support Ron Paul.

  • @SvenBenson

    'The president and the Republicans'.

    You do know that the President is a Democrat right?.

    And Democrats are sold and bought just as much as Republicans, so don't play into this Democrat vs Republican bullshit.

  • Surprise Mr.Dodd was against auditing the Fed but now is the chief lobbyist for SOPA; where the hell are the investigations? Oh wait; the President and the Republicans don't want to address real issues.

  • Sounds like the americans are gettin screwed. Im canadian and im not sure how this affects me.

  • Sanders pulled his punch to not offend the mass murdering Debt Syndicate.

    His explanation, is hollow.

    Why doesn't he gang up with Paul, and PLUNDER THE BANKERS, and then PLUNDER THE GOD DAMN TAX FREE FOUNDATIONS.

  • I have to keep reminding everyone - PLEASE make sure that you are eligible to vote for Ron Paul in the primary. In many states , you must be either unenrolled ( some may call it independent ) , i.e. no party chosen or Republican to vote Ron Paul . If you are a reg. Dem as many may be , please change that to Republican so you are ABLE to vote for Ron in the very important PRIMARY .I cannot emphasize it enough - don't be disappointed at the polls when they say you cannot vote Repub.

  • Compromise is fine if that's what you want.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more