Interesting Effect (Possible OverUnity?)

Using 2 9V batteries, a timer circuit, a transformer, some capacitors and a bridge rectifier I'm getting 500-900 Volts DC and .3-.5 Amps.

While browsing http://www.overunity.com I came across a post about someone connecting a transformer to a 12V battery and tapping the negative wire on battery terminal and getting the "kick" (surge in voltage) that Tesla talked about. I tried it, it worked :-)

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• overunity
• free
• energy
• Steven
• Mark
• Tesla

[klexn]

That's not overunity.. You're not going to have 500+ volts with a 250ma load.. You're Power figures are all fucked up.. Throw a resistor across it, measure your voltage across the R, figure I, then mult I x V = P (Watts).. Measure input power and calculate P (Watts) and you'll come up short on the other side of the transformer by quite a bit.. 1N4001 diodes steal a bit of power ya know.. =) Study slew rates of semiconductors.

[singerxyz]

You're right- I now know more about measuring current than I did when I made this video. I keep it posted for the sake of the circuit. I'll update when I get the chance.

[gabydewilde]

I think you are measuring the voltage on a charged cap. The amperage you see is from a short circuit. You are however on the right track. :) Should try to make the pulse with empty batteries. That way you know you are not drawing any amps. Empty batteries stay empty for a very long time. Very reliable. lol

[singerxyz]

Thanks for the response- Not sure what you mean by "make the pulse with batteries"?

[Max75572]

If you want to get the plans for Overunity Generator?

Go to Google and search for "Top Magnetic Generator" ...

Choose the First Result (Ignore the Advertisements)

[georgeutterpower]

Imagine you had time to make this video, but didn't have time to learn ohms law :-)

you should run for political office in California, they'll love you!

[gconol]

I had this video on my play list for many years. It's only now that I realized the significance of your little experiment. I learned much about radiant spikes since then. Thanks singerz.

[PhyUL09]

@JoelHarvey1 Yeah the universe is flat I agree, but what I meant is that it's entropy always increase... there is no input of energy possible, except in some yet to be proven weird string theory effect(Which would be very great if true), which would also have created the universe, but in any ways the energy input in a flat universe is kinda very brutal and would not happen through the electromagnetic force that's for sure (It's too weak at high energies, think about plasmas).

[PhyUL09]

@JoelHarvey1 I'm sorry but about Einstein and the ether you are wrong. Einstein's relativity is based on the fact that the speed of light is the same in every frame of reference, which would not be true if there was an ether since objects could actually break the speed of light just like airplanes break the speed of sound. I'm also sorry to inform you that all that I learned have been presented to me with rigorous mathematical demonstrations based on experimental facts...

[JoelHarvey1]

@PhyUL09 THE UNIVERSE IS AN OPEN SYSTEM DO YOUR RESEARCH

L.C TOM BEARDEN

[JoelHarvey1]

@PhyUL09 im not saying it works i'm saying that you are thinking inside the box and that education system is brain washing the masses to control them. do some research on JOHN bedini. DONT TAKE OTHER FILIP ON IT.

NIKOLA TESLA IS ANOTHER ON. OH AND EINSTEIN IS ANOTHER TOO ALL SUPPORT THE FREE FLOW OF ENERGY. EINSTEIN CONCLUDED THER IS AN EITHER

[PhyUL09]

@JoelHarvey1 2. If this thing can work for a while it must certainly not work forever as it will break the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Since our universe is a closed system (It does work like one as of today...), It's energy tends to equalize everywhere, like hot water in a cold room, it means that creating energy from nothing is impossible and this has been experimented a lot of times since it's discovery in the 1800's. Oh and I certainly do my researches since I study physics...

[PhyUL09]

@JoelHarvey1 There are 2 things that bother me in this video in fact: 1. When the guy gets the current intensity he only switches the wire in his multimeter but not on his circuit... A voltmeter and an ammeter do not work the same way and must be plugged differently. That's why he gets such high intensity... an ammeter has a low resistance and he plugs it in parallel like his voltmeter... I = V/R