Gravity, waves, photons, Video 3.
Uploader Comments (MrFrancisH)
All Comments (27)
-
@MrFrancisH I agree with the point they are not constant , not because of the wave behaviour alone. , but there size. Different sizes creates different wavelengths which create different colours.
-
@zanaelf No offence taken at all. I thought it wiser to explain my background such that my 'take' on reality could be understood.
Best regards, Frank.
-
The photon is quantum universe containing smaller particles that move in vortex torus structure., its spin is not like it is known, but flows in vortex , like that of the gravitation fields of galaxies, stars and planets. The energy If you look at E=mc2 one cannot remove the (m) part and say that it exists as nothing but flowing energy. Photons themselves have a mass and can be formulated in equation.
-
@MrFrancisH Thank you very much, the problem is that people look at the wave and not its composition, nothing cannot create something , it is only transferred and transformed, like the law of conservation of energy. Energy is vibration and the behaviour. If photon is energy. If photon existed as energy only, it would not be pulled or its path of travel effected by gravity, and travel in strait line, but it is thus it has substance as it is attracted by gravity, as well has its own gravitational
-
@MrFrancisH Hello Thank you very much for the reply, yup many apologies if I offended you, as I never meant to , and I am not man ((^_^))
If you see my video "Future Dreams" just near the end you would see the table of bosons, aranged in a similar fashion to that of elements in periodic table, A photon is smaller than electron, it would be impossible for a particle to magically loose size and mass to be come photon, but would be more logical for it to be still travelling, but releasing a photon from itself. Photons together form the larger heavier bosons.
zanaelf 1 year ago
@zanaelf Hi again my friend. Schrodinger, in 1923, had already suggested that 'particles' were some form of standing waves. However, whilst it was accepted that this appeared to have some veracity, there were found to be problems with the fact that the speed of light is not a constant for all electromagnetic wavelengths and also, if I remember correctly, values many times greater than expected needed to be accommodated in the formulae. contd.
MrFrancisH 1 year ago
@zanaelf Cont'd. In my uploads I intended to clarify that, since matter can only be Energy, and that Energy possibly electromagnetic, then 'Mass' is nothing other than how particles behave in relation to adjacent Matter and to the Universe in general. Gravity being simply the refraction of the Matter Wave. i.e. A Spacetime
distortion or warp as per Einstein.
Wave Mechanics has gone a little way down this path but has 'chickened-out' taking the theory to a logical conclusion.
MrFrancisH 1 year ago
@MrFrancisH hmm,I do apologise I disagree on that as it would not make Infinity like a fractal Infinite but finite which means at the end of the universe is nothing, and from the smallest known particle which you accept as a particle nothing, if this is the case, the universe would collapse on itself and cancel out forever into absolute nothing with no existence of energy as well. The"mass" isnt nothing,it appears as nothing because it is too tiny for earth humanity physically measure,mass not 0
zanaelf 1 year ago
@zanaelf Please allow for my excentricities. My uploads 1 to 6 (I think) lay down my interpretation of Gravity with a nodding aqaintance to what constitutes Matter. I continually stress that I dislike the term Particle. Since Dirac predicted that an high energy photon can convert to both an Electron and a Positron (anti-matter), and this was proved photographically in a Wilson Cloud Chamber, I have held that all matter is only energy. Whether this energy can continue forever I don't know.
MrFrancisH 1 year ago