I see our experience of that flow of time as 3 dimensional cross sections of the fourth dimension just as motion picture movies are 2 dimensional cross sections of the 3rd dimension. Also, we talk about what time does and behaves like, but what is it's ontology, if any?
I wonder how this discussion would have transpired were Nassim Herramein attended.? Being a fan of his and his postulates. A lot of the questions raised here would have had less ambiguous endings.
It looks to me like time moves at the speed of light and energy and mass slow it down to form their own spacetime geometry. Because we are energy and mass we therefore create our own spacetime geometry of broken symmetry. Time is only relative to the energy or mass of the object that is forming the spacetime.
My conception of time is basically the tracking of matter across space (if your standing still in relation to the object) or tracking of interactions between matter (decay, entropy). I think this definition accounts for relativity, for example, I send an apple near the speed of light around the neighboring solar systems. It returns after 20 years with almost no decay because time was going slower for the apple and chemical interactions were slower, but for us 20 years have past.
I see our experience of that flow of time as 3 dimensional cross sections of the fourth dimension just as motion picture movies are 2 dimensional cross sections of the 3rd dimension. Also, we talk about what time does and behaves like, but what is it's ontology, if any?
tatsumakisempyukaku 10 months ago
some of those guys really talk some bullshit...
but nevertheless, i like this series :)
Leinadi 1 year ago
I wonder how this discussion would have transpired were Nassim Herramein attended.? Being a fan of his and his postulates. A lot of the questions raised here would have had less ambiguous endings.
saintron60 1 year ago
@InfectedDaemon So are you saying that is time is a chemical reaction ?
TheConsciousGamer1 1 year ago
It looks to me like time moves at the speed of light and energy and mass slow it down to form their own spacetime geometry. Because we are energy and mass we therefore create our own spacetime geometry of broken symmetry. Time is only relative to the energy or mass of the object that is forming the spacetime.
nickharvey7 2 years ago
My conception of time is basically the tracking of matter across space (if your standing still in relation to the object) or tracking of interactions between matter (decay, entropy). I think this definition accounts for relativity, for example, I send an apple near the speed of light around the neighboring solar systems. It returns after 20 years with almost no decay because time was going slower for the apple and chemical interactions were slower, but for us 20 years have past.
InfectedDaemon 2 years ago
"Time" O.o
PallaAurinkoon 2 years ago