John Lennon - The Paul Goresh photos
Top Comments
All Comments (226)
-
If you want to see some scary shlt that John had to deal with in the late 70's, go to the FBI web site & search John Lennon & look at the letters he was getting from Puerto Rican terrorists in '77 & 78 etc., trying to extort $100,000 from him & threatening his life ......
-
There is a political activist named Carlos Montes, the FBI raided his home took his computer and files. Montes also organized anti war rallies.
He was arrested on the stop by the L.A. Sheriff's who said the raid was ordered by the FBI.
The excuse they had for arresting him was because Montes ownes a gun.
Now just imagine if he had 10 million dollars in his bank and millions of supports, what would the government do then?
-
I believe Fred Seaman.
-
@NeilFraudstrong You have to look at it from a cover-up angle. Constantine suggests there were motives to hide something Lennon wrote or insert opportunistic information. This possibly conforms to intel being worried about or doctoring potential information involving a targeted victim. Project Walrus and Rosen could have been this kind of chaos operation. In any case this is secondary to the Bresler evidence.
-
When it comes to Fred, a lot of what you hear about him is false. This is a recurring myth that he edited or somehow schemed to forge elements of John's journal and his own journal, but this is not true. His apartment was burglarized and his own personal journal was stolen and forged with the so called Project Walrus scheme.
-
I heard Seaman was involved in accessing the diaries that were then manipulated. Whatever the case, you have to understand that this wasn't Lennon vs Reagan it was US vs Lennon and some very wolfish covert powers and their interests. If you had a shrewder sense of this you would understand those same powers used another Catcher In The Rye Lone Nut to try and kill Reagan. You can only legitimately deal with this by the evidence. This requires discussion of Chapman's airline ticket forgeries.
-
@NeilFraudstrong You are promoting a campaign of denial against the obvious. You can't just lurk and pounce in when you have an out of context gotcha point you think you can win. This business deals with very deep stuff that has to do with intel and how they work. I recommend reading Phil Strongman's book and learning a little about covert interests and tactics. You are tryng a strawman which says Reagan killed Lennon or Lennon's friendliness towards Reagan excluded any intel motivations.
-
That is complete and utter bull. Fred did not alter or forge any of John's journals in any way whatsoever.
-
@winstono75 Read about Seaman and his involvement in the forgery and alteration of Lennon's diaries. All part of the psy-ops type campaigns aimed against such political assassination targets. What you are suggesting, despite the obvious, is that Lennon would have been a good bunny and endorsed Reagan's rapacious conservative policies and CIA covert wars. Nice try. If you had any credible studied knowledge you would realize their were covert powers above beyond Reagan that killed Lennon.
-
Finally, a voice of reason to step in the middle of this madness. John met Reagan with May Pang on December 9th, 1974, when Reagan was the governor of California and both were on Monday Night Football. Reagan had his arm around John and was explaining the intricacies of the game to John and they got on really well on a personal level.
@BarryDennen12
Despite what Paul likes to say, John and Paul Goresh were not friends. John got enraged at him after he broke into his bedroom and he was absolutely livid. Eventually, he calmed down about it and he tolerated him, but he always gave John the creeps. I know that there are pictures of John smiling in photos with him, but John did not care for Paul Goresh at all. This is a myth that has been spread by Paul. Goresh was just as much a stalker as MDC, but with no homicidal plans.
NeilFraudstrong 8 months ago 4
@spm1021 You're obviously ignorant and haven't read any of the necessary material on this needed to have a credible opinion. You're obviously clueless about Bresler's and Strongman's investigations and evidence.
Exiles800 1 month ago