More at http://www.inlookout.com
Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas described the Matthew Shepard Act which is attached to a defense authorization bill as holding soldiers hostage and a sociological attac...
More at http://www.inlookout.com Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas described the Matthew Shepard Act which is attached to a defense authorization bill as holding soldiers hostage and a sociological attack on the morals of America.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Rep. Gohmert says the FBI reported that hate crimes are down the last 20 years. What he doesn't tell you is that the FBI doesn't keep statistics on hate crimes against homosexuals, because the federal law doesn't state that crimes against the homosexual community are hate crimes.
If opposing the senseless, hate motivated murder of gays is "liberal", what does that say about conservatives? Myself, I'd say it's a pretty non-partisan issue, or at least should be. What kind of savage would favor such a thing? We see the answer to that in the responses here.
Sharia law demands people be put to death for homosexuality. Only a complete fucking imbecile would argue that people opposed to the murder of people for their sexual orientation favor Sharia law. Fucking hateful asshole.
"Liberals" were opposing the Taliban while Conservatives were selling them weapons, dumbfuck. Religious rules OF ANY KIND have no right to demand non-believers follow them. You fucking hateful imbecile, you are arguing in favor of religious law RIGHT HERE IN THIS THREAD. Christian, Muslim, I don't care, just keep your superstition away from my life.
You liberals are hateful against Christians and Jews. If you liberals really are opposed to religion, then why don't you criticize radical Islam? Yeah, I've seen your "peace rallies."
they affect me regardless of whether i commit a crime. i dont want the government deciding what citizens are more important than others; which ones are off limits or you get a higher punishment. when someone commits a crime their punishment is decided by whether they intended to do it and whether it was premeditated. there is no point to talk about why he attacked the person in regards to race or group. and it is a slippery slope just like "hate speech" and all this political correctness
Since we are all humans, whenever someone uses namecalling they should put human at the end perhaps it will remind people that we are all the same species. from the animals pont of view we are the most vile and disgusting thing on the planet, when was the last time you walked into a bear cave and seen a human skin rug, or into a wolf's den and seen human heads on the wall. If not for the children that are the hope for a better tomorrow I would pray that mankind was eradicated off the planet!!!!!
In this country on the east coast from the 1600's to the 1700's it was the law to kill homosexual humans by hanging and with lesbian humans humans also killed the daughters just in case they might be lesbians. In this country humans used the bible to condone slavery for well over a hundred years. I have nothing against the bible or christian humans just humans who use the bible to commit and justify their evil deeds! The bible has much good in it and it also sadly has evil in it as well.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Myself, I'd say it's a pretty non-partisan issue, or at least should be. What kind of savage would favor such a thing? We see the answer to that in the responses here.
Fucking hateful asshole.
Religious rules OF ANY KIND have no right to demand non-believers follow them. You fucking hateful imbecile, you are arguing in favor of religious law RIGHT HERE IN THIS THREAD.
Christian, Muslim, I don't care, just keep your superstition away from my life.