CREATIONISM COMPLETLEY DESTROYED BY RICHARD DAWKINS
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (684)
-
The work that is the basis for this argument is Creation’s Tiny Mystery by Robert Gentry. His interpretations of his data were faulty. Geologist Lorence Collins notes: ”The geology of the sites at which Po halos are found clearly shows that Gentry’s proof of instantaneous creation and a young Earth is nothing of the sort. Gentry’s Po halos simply do not occur in primordial granites, but instead were formed in relatively young dikes that demonstrably crosscut older sedimentary and igneous rocks.
-
This guy lies by calling this a Richard Dawkins video and then proceeds to make gross errors in high school-level science.
Dishonesty and stupidity seem to surround everything about this creationism stuff.
-
what does 'evolutionary theory' have to do with the contents of granite?
-
"This is something that evolutionary theory suggests; that molten rock slowly cooled to form granite."
... what?
-
no hard evidence of our origins until now? first off, what you have shown is not evidence for creationism, there has literally never been even ONE piece of evidence to support your pathetic fairytale while every, yes, EVERY piece of evidence supports evolution
-
We can be sure that if the claim here were true, it would mean that Cosmology, biology, Evolutionary science and all of the disciplines dependent on it would have to be false. That would mean that atavistic dna, and vestigial organs should not exist, but they do!
And it's interesting how these people will engage in deception (hence the title), and even outright lie.
The truth doesn't fear scrutiny.
-
This has NOTHING to do with Richard Dawkins.
Underhanded efforts to fish for views and pseudo-science don't make god real and you can't cherry pick your evidence.
If god was real and he wanted us all to know of his existence and his creations it should be exceedingly easy to prove. All it would take is one, ONE scientifically, empirically verifiable finding to overturn mountains of tested, peer reviewed theories on nature. Yet, creationists can't seem to find that proof....
I wonder why.
-
Did dr. doolittle jr just claim the theory of evolution suggests molten rock slowely cools to form granite?
-
Granites are constantly being reworked and metamorphosed. Pick up a book on Petrology and you can debunk halos in about 20 minutes.
-
God isn't dead. For something to be dead, it has to be alive, or at least existing or real.
If you purport this is proof of creationism, please gather your evidence and submit it to scientific debate. You would be the first with any proof of creationism. Until then, this is just delusional assumptions.
futurepsycdoc 3 years ago 12
PaineLover, you got that right...
"Creationists cannot propagate their religion with honest means. ALL they have is lies, distortions, strawman claims about their opponents, bogus quotes and forgeries. Standard Operating Procedure for them.
Creationism is NOT "way cool". It's ignorance; it's religion TRYING to mask itself by the use of pseudo-science. "
jcub33 3 years ago 7