Is Alternative Energy an Alternative?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
321 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 28, 2007

Rambling on the state of alternative energy development.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (AzrielSivad)

  • You forgot (hot) fusion! Imagine the hydrogen in a single bathtub of water supplying your energy needs for the next 30 years! Also, are you gay? cuz I think you're cute ....and rather intelligent. :)

  • Fusion has its own bag full of problems, so I didnät really hit on it. And, of course I'm gay!

  • Very well thought out video. I would like to vote for covering Utah in solar panels at this point.

  • It is quite a useless state. We'll just have to air lift the tabernacle, a tomb of God.

  • Well, then we pretty much agree. I agree on them seeing the shift and wanting control and also wanting to get all the use out of that oil on the ground unfortunately politically and economically. I also agree we should have the power over our energy, Nicola Tesla comes to mind. We should focus on safe energy for sure. I mean we put a man on the moon so...

  • Glad we agree. Tesla kicks Edison's ass any day. We put en on the moon using hydrocarbons.

Video Responses

This video is a response to Re: Question 1
see all

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • why that funny background music? why gay as a tag?

  • Oh, no. cCrporate powers do see the shift coming, but the want to be in charge of that shift. That way, the energy companies can always have a stranglehold over their costumers. Power over energy should rest in the hands of the populace, a municipal power.

    It's not that I think alternative energy is useless, I think t need to be better developed, or when the oil runs out in 20 years, we are all fucked.

  • And lets not forget while we integrate these safe uses oif energy research will take the forefront and what is solar, wind and water is now would be quickly surpassed. I think we have to see the facts that it's not that safer power could not be developed to make the shift but that corporate powers that be don't want the shift. It would take power away from those whole hold it now and to them thats a no no...

  • While I think you make some good points overall I have to strongly disagree here. Let me explain. Solar, wind, water etc should be used in tandem and intergrated. And the fact that you think conservation in tandem with these is useless, well I think you are totally wrong. Even 70 years ago there were carborators that could get 70 miles per gallon. Think about the likelihood of now that being much higher. It would cut use and emmissions drastically.

  • Loading comment...
Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more