Faith The Basis for Atheism.(MIRROR)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
150 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Uploaded by on Jun 23, 2011

Description from sohyb09

While Atheists can't prove a negative that God doesn't exist, they cheaply hold their claim with no proof, with no leg to stand, with no basis, with no position that, "God indeed doesn't exist". This video seeks atheism's standard point-- why they hold on to atheism? And revealed that while atheists have no answer and proof in justification for their atheistic belief-- they in turn are on something they don't want to talk about: FAITH. If faith (which it really is), then they should stop bashing theism and religion.
See Matt Slick on the web site below as he skinned Atheists through and through. I quoted him a lot:

http://www.carm.org/atheism


This video is a mirror of following video

Please subscribe to sohyb09

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znNDLXDUe5Y

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Video Responses

This video is a response to Christopher Hitchens takes on religion
see all

All Comments (53)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @peace4universe That isn't my criteria, because I have none. I'm saying that this is what I believe if there were a God. Atheists don't walk around saying we know everything, that we know the world "works like "x" and behaves like "y". We'd be the first to admit the world isn't known, however, theists firmly believe in their story of choice.

    No, it proves nothing more than the truth that our understanding of this world is growing by leaps and bounds. Uncertainty doesn't prove God by any means.

  • @peace4universe that was in the medieval ages, there is a reason we changed our minds. And by this reply, I assume your answer to my previous question is yes, and what you say to me from this point on will be coloured by this fact, with the survivability as it is today, your point is completely mute, and stand as a representation of a civilization unable to change to the better

  • @Multimorten What westerners take as marriage at seven or six used to be marriage contract with girl remaining with parents until puberty.

    Girls were traditionally considered lucky if they were married/engaged earlier as asking for the hand of a girl was considered as honouring the girl and her parents.

  • @Multimorten

    You need to have the knowledge of backgroud custom and necessity of the time.

    Early reproduction was a necessity for human survival, the estimated life span being 28-30 with eight children required to be delivered by each fertile wife just to MAINTAIN the population.

    So puberty meant for starting reproductions .

    Watch the video I referred

    Islam requires three criteria for marriage:

    Physical maturity

    Psychological maturity and

    Social circumstances .

    /watch?v=X6SlXID9v7k

  • @PhRiZoN

    "" if there were a God, it's workings would be at such a magnitude above our understanding of this world, we couldn't even comprehend it.""

    If this is your criterion to accept God's existence then study any subject and see that at every point there is a statement "We do not know"

    We are not sure ""etcetc"

    The more we get the knowledge about this universe or the working of living beings we need to say that there is still a lot to explore.

    So that proves that God exists

  • @peace4universe There is no answer to this question, from me. I don't believe in any God whatsoever, and to me, thinking that you know God is truly ignorant. You continue believing in something that there is no evidence of. I believe that, even if there were a God, it's workings would be at such a magnitude above our understanding of this world, we couldn't even comprehend it. It's in this sense that I find theists truly ignorant.

  • @peace4universe this changes nothing, I am well aware about how early someone can give birth in some situations, it makes no difference. There is NO WAY, that the critical thinking skills have finished developing at that age, and know what consequences your actions have, especially who you should spend the rest of your life with. And one of these videos stated that she got married at age 7. Do you think this is ethical?

  • @Multimorten

    /watch?v=X6SlXID9v7k

    Visit the websites referred in both these videos

    Thank you

  • @Multimorten

    /watch?v=nMYLI2o1kwc

    This is one argument about the defense of the Prophet.

    Till last centuries , the age of consent in history was puberty or at the most seven.

    Google the age of consent in history although currently we cannot imagine that a 9 years old can be a fully grown woman once she attains puberty.

    I will be giving other evidences too.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more